green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kenton Lee Bernard, A/K/A Kenneth Lee Madden, A/K/A Kenneth Lee Bishop, A/K/A Larry Wells v. United States
e think it likely that dealing illicitly with a tractor and trailer, even if the two items are already hooked together when stolen and when moving in interstate commerce, involves a larger misdeed than dealing with a single trailer.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tilus
In any case involving a possible conflict of interest, the court must be mindful of the defendant’s constitu- tional right to the counsel of his choice; see United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 204 (2d Cir.) (recognizing defendant’s ‘‘constitutional right to be represented by counsel of his own choice’’), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S. Ct. 217 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lola Shodeinde, Also Known as Sylvester Jacowen, Jimmy Fasheun-Tokunbo, Also Known as Michael Mahoney
See United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 197 (2d Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mukhtar A. Malik
See United States v. Mack, 837 F.2d 254, 258 (6th Cir.1988) (" 'Reversal is required only where substantial rights of the appellants are involved.' ") (quoting United States v. Grunsfeld, 558 F.2d 1231, 1238 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Newman
See United States v. Kidding, 560 F.2d 1303, 1310 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David R. Knoll and Ted W. Gleave
See United States v. Buhar, 567 F.2d 192 , 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Randolph Jakobetz
See United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 197 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mary McDermott and Alphonse Iannacone
See United States v. Bu-bar, 567 F.2d 192 , 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977); see also United States v. Gotchis, 803 F.2d 74, 81 (2d Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Orville Albert Weigelt (86-5822), Howard Emmet Bramblett (86-5980), Ronald Raymond Schroeder (86-5992)
See United States v. Grunsfeld, 558 F.2d 1231, 1236-37 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977) and 434 U.S. 1016 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Podolsky
See United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 200-01 (2d Cir.1977) (dynamite placed under barrel of gasoline), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977); United States v. Peterson, 475 F.2d 806, 810-11 (9th Cir.1973) (flare and fuse combined with gunpowder), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 846 , 94 S.Ct. 111 , 38 L.Ed.2d 93 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gazzara
See United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 198-99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Archibald
See United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 198-99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Armand Goguen
See United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 195 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William J. Scott
See United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Williams v. Franzen
See United States v. Kidding, 560 F.2d 1303, 1310 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Packard
(2×)
“Because reliability is the ‘linchpin’ in determining the admissibility of identification evidence; Manson v. Brathwaite, supra, 114 ; State v. Piskorski, supra, 742 ; we must consider whether under the ‘totality of circumstances’ the identifications were reliable.” State v. Theriault, supra, 373 ; see United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S. Ct. 217 , 54 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Love and Mark Anthony Cloyd
See United States v. Matlock, 558 F.2d 1328, 1332 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 218 , 54 L.Ed.2d 152 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Matlock, 558 F.2d 1328 (8th Cir.) (evidence that defendant possessed 61 credit cards in 3 different names admissible on the issue of intent to defraud in prosecution for making false statements on credit card application), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 218 , 54 L.Ed.2d 152 (1977); United States v. McPartlin, 595 F.d 1321 (7th Cir.) (evidence of defendant's corporate officer's prior bribes of foreign officials properly admitted on the issue of defendant's intent to bribe city officials), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 833 , 100 S.Ct. 65 , 62 L.Ed.2d 43 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cuyler v. Sullivan
See United States v. Kidding, 560 F. 2d 1303, 1310 (CA7), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 872 (1977); United States v. Mandell, 525 F. 2d 671, 675-677 (CA7 1975), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1049 (1976); Geer, supra n. 11, at 145-146.
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Bellavia v. Walter Fogg, Warden, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Stormville, New York
(2×)
Accord, e. g., United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 , 201-02 (2 Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977); Rickenbacker v. Warden, 550 F.2d 62, 65-66 (2 Cir. 1976), and cases there cited, Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 (1977); Lunz v. Henderson, 533 F.2d 1322, 1327 (2 Cir.), Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 849 (1976). 31 We think that the best summary of the record facts before us which belies appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is the statement by Judge Sifton in his opinion of June 5, 1978 denying Bellavia's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel D. Menendez
Accord, e. g., United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 , 201-02 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977); Rickenbacker v. Warden, 550 F.2d 62, 65-66 (2 Cir. 1976), and cases there cited, cert. denied, 434 U.S. 826 (1977); Lunz v. Henderson, 533 F.2d 1322, 1327 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 849 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Prescott
See United States v. Hancock, 558 F.2d 1300 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 207 , 54 L.Ed.2d 157 (1977); United States v. Medico, 557 F.2d 309 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 986 , 98 S.Ct. 615 , 54 L.Ed.2d 481 (1977); United States v. Ochoa, 543 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Meyer v. NILES TP., ILL.
See McDonald v. State of Illinois, 557 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 5.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ellis
See United States v. Grunsfeld, C.A. 6th (1977), 558 F.2d 1231, 1237 , certiorari denied (1977), 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 219 , 54 L.Ed.2d 152 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald John Holmes
See United States v. Matlock, 558 F.2d 1328, 1332 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 218 , 54 L.Ed.2d 152 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mejia v. People of the State of New York
“The test governing whether a prosecutor's statements amount to an improper comment on the accused's silence in violation of the Fifth Amendment looks at the statements in context and examines whether they ‘naturally and necessarily’ would be interpreted by the jury as a comment on the defendant's failure to testify.” U.S. Knoll, 16 F.3d 1313, 1323 (2d Cir. 1995); see also United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S. Ct. 217 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duren v. LaManna
“The test governing whether a prosecutor’s statements amount to an improper comment on the accused’s silence in violation of the Fifth Amendment looks at the statements in context and examines whether they ‘naturally and necessarily’ would be interpreted by the jury as a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify.” U.S. Knoll, 16 F.3d 1313, 1323 (2d Cir. 1995); see also United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S. Ct. 217 , 54 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elder
Therefore, the "[c]hoice of counsel should not be unnecessarily obstructed by the court." United States v. Bernstein , 533 F.2d 775 , 788 (2d Cir. 1976) ; see also United States v. Bubar , 567 F.2d 192 , 203 (2d Cir. 1977) (recognizing a defendant's "constitutional right to be represented by counsel of his own choice"), cert. denied , 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ware v. New York
Id.; see also United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977); United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 98 (2d Cir.) (prosecutor may not suggest that the defendant has any burden of proof or any obligation to adduce any evidence whatever), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990); United States v. McDermott, 918 F.2d 319, 328 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1681 , 114 L.Ed.2d 76 (1991); United States v. Gotchis, 803 F.2d 74, 81 (2d Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Guillermo Aliro Perez
(2×)
Hence the “[ejhoice of counsel should not be unnecessarily obstructed by the court.” United States v. Bernstein, 533 F.2d 775, 788 (2d Cir.1976); see also United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 203 (2d Cir.1977) (recognizing a defendant’s “constitutional right to be represented by counsel of his own choice”), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977); United States v. Armedo-Sarmiento, 524 F.2d 591, 592 (2d Cir.1975) (Sixth Amendment protects criminal defendant’s selection of retained counsel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williams
See, e.g., United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977) (noting that single photographic display is impermissibly suggestive absent exigent circumstances); Mysholowsky v. People, 535 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.1976); see also Simmons, supra, 390 U.S. at 384-85 (singly presented photograph absent exigent circumstances is impermissibly suggestive photographic identification procedure). *415 If the challenged identification procedure is unduly suggestive, the court must then proceed to the second step in the analysis.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerald Phillips
Furthermore, although the prosecutor may not ask the jury to infer guilt from the fact that the defendant has invoked his fifth amendment privilege not to testify, Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965), "[a] prosecutor may properly comment upon a defendant's failure to present witnesses so long as it is not phrased as to call attention to defendant's own failure to testify," United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1343 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 (1982); see also United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 98 (2d Cir.) (noting that a prosecutor is "entitled to comment on a defend…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillips
Furthermore, although the prosecutor may not ask the jury to infer guilt from the fact that the defendant has invoked his fifth amendment privilege not to testify, Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965),"[a] prosecutor may prop- erly comment upon a defendant's failure to present witnesses so long as it is not phrased as to call attention to defendant's own failure to testify," United States v. Fleishman, 684 F.2d 1329, 1343 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1044 (1982); see also United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 98 (2d Cir.) (noting that a prosecutor is "entitled to com- ment on a def…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ca2 1996
See, e.g., United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 199-200 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Jairo Arango
See also United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977). 5 12 In this case, Mr. Quintana's performance as trial counsel has not been challenged.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Castillo and Juan Fernandez
See Castillo App. at 17-18; compare United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192, 200 (2d Cir.) (footnote omitted) (citations omitted) (no prejudice from prosecutor’s rebuttal summation resulting to appellants where, inter alia, "any conceivable misunderstanding on the part of the jury was nipped in the bud by Judge Newman’s emphatic curative instructions given first sua sponte_’’), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977). 18 .Section 3A1.2(b) provides for a three level adjustment if: during the course of the offense or immediate flight therefrom, the defendant or a p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur W. Byrd
See e.g., United States v. Grunsfeld, 558 F.2d 1231, 1242 (6th Cir.1977) (where defendant was convicted on five counts and sentenced to four years on each count, to be served concurrently, sentence was not reviewed when one of the counts was deemed invalid because there was no meaningful collateral effect from the conviction on the invalid count), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977); United States v. Swainson, 548 F.2d 657, 662 (6th Cir.1976) (where sentence on a valid count runs concurrently with sentence on invalid count, courts may decline to consider contentions of error), cert. denied, 431 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McLemore v. State
See also McCrory v. State, 505 So.2d 1272 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986). `To support a claim for reversal of the exercise of that discretion, the accused must show prejudice to substantial rights.' United States v. Kidding, 560 F.2d 1303, 1313 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977) (quoted in United States v. Kubiak, supra, at 1552).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Castellano
United States v. Cunningham, 672 F.2d 1064, 1070 (2d Cir. 1982); see also, e.g., United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 , 203 n. 18 (2d Cir.) (recognizing defendant’s “constitutional right to be represented by counsel of his own choice ”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977); United States v. Armedo-Sarmiento, 524 F.2d 591, 592 (2d Cir.1975) (per curiam) (defendant’s sixth amendment rights are implicated by motion to disqualify retained counsel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Carrel Luman and Billy Gene Trammell
See also United States v. Kidding, 560 F.2d 1303 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977) and United States v. Gardner, 516 F.2d 334 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 861 , 96 S.Ct. 118 , 46 L.Ed.2d 89 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Eugene Mears
See, e. g., United States v. Hancock, 558 F.2d 1300, 1302 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 219 , 54 L.Ed.2d 152 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wolczik
See also United States v. Kidding, 560 F.2d 1303 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 872 , 98 S.Ct. 217 , 54 L.Ed.2d 151 (1977) (defendant cannot claim as a substantial right that the Government must reveal to him all inculpatory evidence so that he may know exactly how strong the case is against him and thereby decide whether to plea bargain with the prosecutor).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Moon
See also United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 , 198 (2d Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 872 (1977) (findings of trial judge as to identification issues entitled to great weight). (b) Out-of-court identification.
De Maro et ux.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-5302.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1977.
434 U.S. 872
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.