green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Lundborg v. Phoenix
See, ____ -10- -10- e.g., Strike v. Trans-West Discount Corp., 155 Cal. Rptr. ____ ______ __________________________ 132, 139 (Cal.Ct.App.), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 948 _________________ (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Robinson
See Commonwealth v. Kelly, 484 Pa. 527 , 399 A.2d 1061 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 947 , 100 S.Ct. 417 , 62 L.Ed.2d 317 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Commonwealth
See Simpson v. United States, 435 U.S. at 10, n.4 . 16 The statutory provisions at issue in this case are similar to those at issue in Wayne County Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judge, 406 Mich. 374 , 280 N.W.2d 793 appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question sub. nom., Brintley v. Michigan, 444 U.S. 948 (1979) (use of a firearm in the commission of a felony and robbery “while armed with a dangerous weapon.”) Under Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 343-45 (1975), the Supreme Court’s dismissals for want of a substantial federal question are dispositive precedent for those i…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sours v. State
See n.8 supra. [10] In the jurisdictional statement filed on October 15, 1979, in Brintley v. Michigan, No. 79-5506, appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 948 , 100 S.Ct. 418 , 62 L.Ed.2d 317 (1980), Brintley's counsel argued that conviction and consecutive punishment in one proceeding for armed robbery and felony-firearm under MCLA 750.227b constituted double jeopardy as multiple punishment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lundborg v. Phoenix Leasing, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Strike v. Trans-West Discount Corp., 92 Cal.App.3d 735 , 155 Cal.Rptr. 132, 139 , appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 948 , 100 S.Ct. 417 , 62 L.Ed.2d 317 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold Dean May v. George W. Sumner, Warden
See, e.g., both the majority and dissenting opinions in Wayne County Pros. v. Recorder’s Ct. Judge, 406 Mich. 374 , 280 N.W.2d 793 , appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 948 , 100 S.Ct. 418 , 62 L.Ed.2d 317 (1979).
Smith
v.
Oregon
v.
Oregon
No. 79-472.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1979.
Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Ore. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.