green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.4 score
G Cite
cited 8× by 1 distinct case ·
"By relating a personal history supportive of good character, however, the defendant may achieve the same result."
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Brown
But see United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1190 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979) (“Unlike character witnesses, who must restrict their direct testimony to appraisals of the defendant’s reputation, a defendant-witness may cite specific instances of conduct as proof that he possesses a relevant character trait such as peaceableness.” (internal footnote omitted)).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Sammy G. Daily and Frederik A. Figge
(2×)
by relating a personal history supportive of good character, however, the defendant may achieve the same result.
discussed
Cited "see"
Silverman v. Motorola, Inc.
See United States v. Erickson, 601 F.2d 296, 305 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 481, 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1979) (“If a company officer knows that the financial statements are false or misleading and yet proceeds to file them, the willingness of an accountant to give an unqualified opinion with respect to them does not negate the existence of the requisite intent or establish good faith reliance.”); Aldridge v. A.T.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Softpoint, Inc.
SEC v. Bonastia, 614 F.2d 908 , 914 (3d Cir. 1980) (rejecting a defense of good faith reliance where the defendant was a high-ranking corporate officer who acted with scienter); accord SEC v. Goldfield Deep Mines Co. of Nev., 758 F.2d 459 , 467 (9th Cir.1985) (“If a company officer knows that the financial statements are false or misleading and yet proceeds to file them, the willingness of an accountant to give an unqualified opinion with respect to them does not negate the existence of the requisite intent or establish good faith reliance.”) (quoting United States v. Erickson, 601 F.2d 29…
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1996
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1196 (9th Cir.) ("[i]n a noncustodial atmosphere prior to indictment, most people would deny accusations of having participated in federal offenses"), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Atcheson
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1196 (9th Cir.) (“[i]n a noncustodial atmosphere prior to indictment, most people would deny accusations of having participated in federal offenses”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Hill, United States of America v. Terry Frost
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1180 (9th Cir.) (bill of particulars is not necessary when the indictment is adequate), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 (1979). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1178 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979) (courts must construe indictments “according to common sense”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael H. Miroyan, Michael Miroyan v. United States
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1180-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 (1979). 17 (c) Denial of second motion to continue 18 Miroyan has not shown that the district court's denial of his second motion to continue resulted in actual prejudice to his defense.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1993
See United States v. Boone, 951 F.2d 1526, 1541 (9th Cir.1991). " 'A plain error is a highly prejudicial error affecting substantial rights.' " United States v. Payne, 944 F.2d 1458, 1463 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1598 , 118 L.Ed.2d 313 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael J. Heun
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1180 (9th Cir.) (if the indictment itself provides details of the alleged offense, a bill of particulars is unnecessary), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 (1979). 30 8.
discussed
Cited "see"
Territory of Guam v. Borja
See United States v. Boone, 951 F.2d 1526, 1541 (9th Cir.1991). “ ‘A plain error is a highly prejudicial error affecting substantial rights.’ ” United States v. Payne, 944 F.2d 1458, 1463 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1598 , 118 L.Ed.2d 313 (1992).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Shawn Joaquin Smith, AKA \S-Man\""
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Kessi, 868 F.2d 1097, 1107 (9th Cir.1989) (“We will seldom find plain error when evidence against the defendant is so strong that the absence of the prosecutor’s misconduct would not have changed the verdict.”) (citing United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Helmut \Bill\" Bubbel"
See United States v. Bustillo, 789 F.2d 1364, 1367 (9th Cir.1986) (when no objection is made at trial, review on appeal is for plain error). 12 "A plain error is a highly prejudicial error affecting substantial rights." Reversal of a criminal conviction on the basis of plain error is an exceptional remedy, which we invoke only when it appears necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity and reputation of the judicial process. 13 Id. (quoting, United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 (1979)). 14 On July 13, 1990, at the con…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Seaborn R. Wicker
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nile Smith
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1183 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vernon Reiger, Sr. v. Robert Christensen and Tany S. Hong
When prejudicial matter is brought to the jury’s attention during the course of a trial, the court should “[make] a careful, individual examination of each of the jurors involved, out of the presence of the remaining jurors, as to the possible effect of the articles.” Silverthome v. United States, 400 F.2d 627, 639 (9th Cir. 1968) (quoting Coppedge v. United States, 272 F.2d 504, 508 (D.C.Cir.1959), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 855 , 82 S.Ct. 92 , 7 L.Ed.2d 52 (1961)); accord, United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1183 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jude R. Hayes
(2×)
See United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 769 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); Mahoney v. United States, 420 F.2d 253, 255 (D.C.Cir.1969). 5 After an eight-week trial, the jury returned convictions on 281 counts.
cited
Cited "see"
Carney v. Marathon Oil Co.
See Olsen v. Shell Oil Co., 595 F.2d 1099 , 1103 n. 3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gene Andrew Austad v. Henry Risley and Thomas Sellers, and Attorney General Mike Greely, Additional And
(2×)
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1183 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Abascal, 564 F.2d 821, 833 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 953 , 98 S.Ct. 1583 , 55 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978); Farr v. Pitchess, 522 F.2d 464, 468 (9th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miles v. United States
See United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Brown, 574 F.2d 1274, 1276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978); Boffa, supra, 89 F.R.D. at 530 ; United States v. Mandel, 415 F.Supp. 1033, 1040 (D.Md.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
(2×)
See United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Austin
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170 (CA 9 1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers, 624 F.2d 461 (CA 4 1979), cert. den., 449 U.S. 1078 , 101 S.Ct. 859 , 66 L.Ed.2d 801 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Roberts
See, In re Crumpacker (1978), 269 Ind. 630 , 383 N.E.2d 36 , cert. denied 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 481 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 ; In re Wireman (1977), Ind., 367 N.E.2d 1368 , cert. denied 436 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 2234 , 56 L.Ed.2d 402 ; In re Murray (1977), 266 Ind. 221 , 362 N.E.2d 128 , appeal dismissed, 434 U.S. 1029 , 98 S.Ct. 758 , 54 L.Ed.2d 777 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Baker
The plain error rule should be invoked only when the weakness of the evidence against defendant indicates that a serious injustice was done or when there are errors that “seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Brown, 634 F.2d 819, 829 (5th Cir.1981) (quotation marks omitted); see United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); 3A C.
cited
Cited "see"
First National Bank v. Estate of Russell
See United States v. Erickson, 601 F.2d 296 , 300 n.4 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
First National Bank Of Las Vegas, New Mexico v. Estate Of Milton B. Russell
See United States v. Erickson, 601 F.2d 296 , 300 n.4 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1979) Although a recent Fifth Circuit case, Westchester County Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Legel, Braswell Gov't Sec.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boffa
See United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 768 (C.A.9), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Brown, 574 F.2d 1274, 1276 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1046 , 99 S.Ct. 720 , 58 L.Ed.2d 704 (1978); United States v. Y.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David N. Moore
See United States v. Stout, 601 F.2d 325, 329 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 481 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1979), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Miller
Stigum, supra, at 328 (emphasis in original); see United States v. Erickson, 601 F.2d 296 , 300 n.4 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lutz
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1197-98 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979). 2 Rule 801(d)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that “a statement by a coconspirator . . . during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy” is not hearsay when offered against another conspirator.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1980
See United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1197-98 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979). 2 34 Rule 801(d)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that "a statement by a coconspirator . . . during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy" is not hearsay when offered against another conspirator.
discussed
Cited "see"
GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.
See n. 3, supra. 10 We intimate no view on that issue, which is raised in Consumer Product Safety Comm’n v. GTE Sylvania, Inc., No. 79-521, cert. granted, 444 U. S. 979 (1979). 11 We need not address the issue whether the principle of comity mandated that the District of Columbia court stay or dismiss the action because the Delaware court had jurisdiction over the manufacturers’ suit prior to the filing of the requesters’ complaint.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gary Beeman v. Bruce Stafford, Warden
See also United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 (1979). 13 Nonetheless, Beeman may have a theoretical collateral estoppel and double jeopardy claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Darryl Nichols Payne
(2×)
See also United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.) (“We have found no ease in which a defendant in a criminal proceeding sought to use a prior favorable administrative decision to preclude trial of the matters contained in the indictment.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979). 1 In Alexander , an ALJ denied an injunction request by the U.S. Postal Service against the defendant’s company.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hydroculture, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand
See, e.g., United States v. Erickson, 601 F.2d 296, 305 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1979) (the fact that financial statements are audited by an independent public accounting firm does not relieve bank officers from liability to third parties for wilfully filing materially false and misleading financial statements); In re Interstate Hosiery Mills, Inc., 4 S.E.C. 706, 721 (1939) (management does not discharge its obligation to report accurate financial information to the SEC and investors by employing an independent public accounting firm to audit the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Riley, Norman Burnett, Jeffrey Sizemore, Vincent Mazza
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1184-85 (9th Cir.) (fingerprints of several individuals on a book owned by defendant used as evidence of conspiracy), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Neslund
The circumstances must also be such that "an innocent defendant would normally be induced to respond." United States v. Sears, supra; see also United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1196 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald A. Martin
See also United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1180 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 (1979); United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 64 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Krasovich
"An indictment charging a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 should allege an agreement, the unlawful object toward which the agreement is directed, and an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy." Lane, 765 F.2d at 1380 ; see also United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1177 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Charnay, 537 F.2d 341, 350 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1000 , 97 S.Ct. 528 , 50 L.Ed.2d 610 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary Rodriguez v. Olin Corporation, and Third Party v. Hunter Chemicals, Inc., Smith Valve Corporation, Third Party
See also Olsen v. Shell Oil Co., 595 F.2d 1099 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979) (indemnity agreement providing that ‘contractor agrees to ... indemnify ...
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bolhouse v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven T. Heise
See, e.g., United States v. Moore, 627 F.2d 830, 832 , 101 S.Ct. 1360 , 67 L.Ed.2d 342 (7th Cir.1980) (in a § 7203 prosecution it is acceptable to use earlier returns to show willfulness), cer t. denied, 450 U.S. 916 (1981), citing United States v. Stout, 601 F.2d 325, 329 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 481 , 62 L.Ed.2d 406 (1979); United States v. Thiel, 619 F.2d 778, 781 (8th Cir.) (there is no abuse of discretion in admitting taxpayer’s income tax filings either for the years preceding or following the years upon which the conviction is based), cert. denied, 449 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Quintana
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Kilbourne, 559 F.2d 1263 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 873 , 98 S.Ct. 220 , 54 L.Ed.2d 152 (1977); United States v. Coppola, 526 F.2d 764 (10th Cir.1975); see also People v. Green, 629 P.2d 1098 (Colo.App. 1981); C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrija Artukovic v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 768 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald Gene Sears, United States of America v. Chandra Werner, United States of America v. Hubert Strozyk
See also United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1196 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen Federico
(2×)
See also United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1198 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979) (judge's submission of the case to the jury shows that he found a prima facie case of conspiracy) 7 Substantial evidence is necessary to show a prima facie case of conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mahoney
See, e. g., United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Ruyle, 524 F.2d 1133 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1664 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976); United States v. Gardner, 516 F.2d 334 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 861 , 96 S.Ct. 118 , 46 L.Ed.2d 89 (1975); United States v. Addonizio, 313 F.Supp. 486 (D.N.J.1970), aff’d, 451 F.2d 49 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Baker
See also United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1181-84 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Corbin, 590 F.2d 398, 400-01 (1st Cir. 1979). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nancy Baker and William James Reeder
See also United States v. Giese, 597 F.2d 1170, 1181-84 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Corbin, 590 F.2d 398, 400-01 (1st Cir. 1979) 3 Chavez v. United States, 258 F.2d 816, 819 (10th Cir. 1958).
Consumer Product Safety Commission
v.
GTE Sylvania, Inc.
v.
GTE Sylvania, Inc.
No. 79-521.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.