California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 444 U.S. 989 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 444 U.S. 989 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gaskill v. Specter (cacd, 1980-11-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see" Gaskill v. Specter (2×)
C.D. Cal. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, EEOC v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, 599 F.2d 322 , 330 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, 444 U.S. 989 , 100 S.Ct. 518 , 62 L.Ed.2d 418 (1979).
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn.
v.
Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
No. 79-97.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 1979.
444 U.S. 989
Consideration, Matters, Took.
Published

Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 824.] Motion of respondent Midcal Aluminum, Inc., for reconsideration of order of November 26, 1979 [ante, p. 961], granting divided argument denied. Further consideration of suggestion of mootness of respondent Midcal Aluminum, Inc., is deferred to hearing of case on the merits.

Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.