Jankowski v. United States, 444 U.S. 995 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Jankowski v. United States, 444 U.S. 995 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “there is a compelling governmental concern in preserving the confidentiality of identity of the minor Plaintiff and her family”
137 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 49 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Brianna B. (connappct, 2001-11-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In re Brianna B.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
there is a compelling governmental concern in preserving the confidentiality of identity of the minor plaintiff and her family
cited Cited "see" Lawrence v. Cohn
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirshner v. United States, 603 F.2d 234, 240 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 2821 , 61 L.Ed.2d 274 (1977) and 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 531 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Brannen v. Prince (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ruffin v. State, 243 Ga. 95, 104 (16) ( 252 SE2d 472 ), cert. den. 444 U. S. 995 (100 SC 530, 62 LE2d 425).
discussed Cited "see" McMillan Park Committee v. National Capital Planning Commission
D.D.C. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Watch v. Harris, 603 F.2d 310 (2nd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979) (section 106 procedures apply to the different phases of a project and must be complied with again when the agency next has authority to approve or fund the project.) The issues may be different at each phase of an undertaking, and the opportunities for modifying a negative impact may change over time and with varying circumstances.
cited Cited "see" Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirschner v. United States, 603 F.2d 234 , 241 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 909 , 444 U.S. 995 , 99 S.Ct. 2821 , 100 S.Ct. 531 , 61 L.Ed.2d 274 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Brener v. Becker Paribas Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kirshner v. United States, 603 F.2d 234, 241 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, sub nom., Goldberg v. Kirshner, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 531 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979). 13 In light of the provisions’ similarity, and the Court’s determination that the plaintiffs’ 10(b) claims are arbitrable, the Court sees no reason to prohibit arbitration of the plaintiffs’ § 17(a) claims.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Yonkers Board of Education (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Alma Society, Inc. v. Mellon, 601 F.2d 1225, 1236-38 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 531 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979). 11 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hedge
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
When a jeopardy barred charge has been joined with a permissible charge, however, “[t]he question is not whether the accused was actually prejudiced [by the joinder], but whether there is [a] reasonable possibility that he was prejudiced.” (Emphasis in original.) Id., 864; see also Graham v. Smith, 602 F.2d 1078, 1082-83 (2d Cir.) (conviction on permissible charge vacated when government was unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that defendant was not prejudiced by joinder of jeopardy barred and permissible charge), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S. Ct. 531 , 62 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents and Associates, Inc. v. Colonel Lloyd Kent Brown
5th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Waterbury Action to Conserve Our Heritage, Inc. v. Harris, 603 F.2d 310 , (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lee v. Thornburgh
D.D.C. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also WATCH v. Harris, 603 F.2d 310 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Standing Rock Housing Authority v. Tri-County State Bank, Inc.
D.S.D. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States, 601 F.2d 1116 (10th Cir.1979) cert. denied 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State Ex Rel. May v. Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma
Okla. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States, 601 F.2d 1116, 1135 [10th Cir.1979], cert, denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 [1979].
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re the Estate of Best
NY · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Mason v Abrams, 454 US 806 ; see also, Alma Socy. v Mellon, 601 F2d 1225, cert denied 444 US 995 ), would be easily breached if children who are adopted out of a family are presumed to be takers of class gifts from biological ancestors, as ascertaining whether rights of inheritance exist might well be good cause for access.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Latzer v. Abrams
E.D.N.Y · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Graham v. Smith, 602 F.2d 1078, 1082 (2d Cir.1979) (dictum), cert. denied 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 531 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The City Of New York v. The United States Department Of Transportation
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., WATCH (Waterbury Action to Conserve Our Heritage, Inc.) v. Harris, 603 F.2d 310, 326-27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979); Trinity Episcopal School Corp. v. Romney, 523 F.2d 88, 92-93 (2d Cir.1975); Hanly v. Kleindienst, 471 F.2d 823 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 2290 , 36 L.Ed.2d 974 (1973). 95 I therefore respectfully dissent. 1 Initially, the United States challenged the amendment to the New York City Health Code in federal court.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." City of New York v. United States Department of Transportation
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., WATCH (Waterbury Action to Conserve Our Heritage, Inc.) v. Harris, 603 F.2d 310, 326-27 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979); Trinity Episcopal School Corp. v. Romney, 523 F.2d 88, 92-93 (2d Cir.1975); Hanly v. Kleindienst, 471 F.2d 823 (2d Cir.1972), cert, denied, 412 U.S. 908 , 93 S.Ct. 2290 , 36 L.Ed.2d 974 (1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wicker Park Historic District Preservation Fund v. Pierce
N.D. Ill. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Watch v. Harris, 603 F.2d 310 , 324 n. 31 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979); Save the Courthouse Committee v. Lynn, 408 F.Supp. 1323, 1337-38 (S.D.N.Y.1975).
cited Cited "see, e.g." National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
S.D. Ohio · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also WATCH v. Harris, 603 F.2d 310, 326 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 530 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davidson v. Yeshiva University
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 , 88 S.Ct. 2186 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1189 (1968) (involving 42 U.S.C. § 1982 ); see also Alma Society, Inc. v. Mellon, 601 F.2d 1225, 1237-38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 531 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Keys v. Wolfe
N.D. Tex. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Kirschner v. United States, 603 F.2d 234, 241 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 995 , 100 S.Ct. 531 , 62 L.Ed.2d 426 (1979); Daniel v. International Bd. of Teamsters, 561 F.2d 1223, 1245 (7th Cir. 1977), rev’d on other grounds, 439 U.S. 551 , 99 S.Ct. 790 , 58 L.Ed.2d *1059 808 (1979); Newman v. Prior, 518 F.2d 97 (4th Cir. 1975). 6 .
Jankowski
v.
United States
No. 79-5644.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 1979.
444 U.S. 995
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.