green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto J. Benevento, Ernest A. Benevento, Earl A. Keller, and Carmine Loiacono
See United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 834-35 (2d Cir.1980) (border search exception applies to searches of persons departing country as well as to searches of persons entering the country), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981); United States v. Swarovski, 592 F.2d 131, 133 (2d Cir.1979) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Corp.
See United States v. Ajlouny, 476 F.Supp. 995, 999 (E.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd on other grounds, 629 F.2d 830 (2d Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981) (evidence of defendant’s P.L.O. connection did not warrant dismissal of the indictment).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lane
(2×)
See United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F. 2d 830, 843 (CA2 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1111 (1981); United States v. Seidel, 620 F. 2d 1006 (CA4 1980); United States v. Hatcher, 680 F. 2d 438, 442 (CA6 1982); United States v. Varelli, 407 F. 2d 735, 747-748 (CA7 1969); United States v. Martin, 567 F. 2d 849, 854 (CA9 1977); Baker v. United States, 131 U. S. App. D.
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. May v. Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma
See, United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890 , 894 [9th Cir.1980], cert, denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 839 [1981].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 1020 Electronic Gambling MacHines
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890, 898 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 919 , 66 L.Ed.2d 839 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leonard Joseph Yannott
(2×)
Rather the scope of section 1152 is limited to the applicability or non-applicability of federal enclave laws, those laws passed by the federal government in the exercise of its police powers over federal property and now defined in the United States Code in terms of “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” 18 U.S.C. § 7 . *1004 722 F.2d at 385 (quoting United States v. White, 508 F.2d 453, 454-55 (8th Cir.1974)); see also United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890, 896-97 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 919 , 920, 66 L.Ed.2d 839 (1981); Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No. Oag 5-88, (1988)
Compare United States v. Farris , 624 F.2d 890 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied , 449 U.S. 1111 (1981) and Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians, San Diego County, Cal. v. Duffy , 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir. 1982) with United States v. Dakota , 796 F.2d 186 (6th Cir. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
(2×)
See also United States v. Farris, 624 F. 2d 890 (CA9 1980), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 1111 (1981), discussed in n. 13, infra. [11] Nor does Pub.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Langley v. Ryder
(2×)
Compare 18 U.S.C. § 13 (state criminal law applies as surrogate federal law in federal enclaves for offenses that are not otherwise punishable under federal law) and 18 U.S.C. § 1152 (federal enclave laws apply in Indian country to offenses committed by Indians) and United States v. Sosseur, 181 F.2d 873 (7th Cir.1950) (Wisconsin criminal law against conducting gambling operations applied as surrogate federal law in Wisconsin Indian country through sections 13 and 1152) with 18 U.S.C. § 1955 (operation of a gambling enterprise that violates the law of the state in which it is conducted cons…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moapa Band of Paiute Indians, a Chartered Indian Tribe v. United States Department of Interior, an Agency of the Government of the United States
Compare Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983) (state law regulates bingo, so bingo not forbidden to Indians by ACA) and Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982) (same) with Marcyes, 557 F.2d at 1364 (although state law allows limited use of fireworks it is essentially prohibitory and so applies to Indian reservation via ACA) and United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890 (9th Cir.1980)…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andrew Duggan, Eamon Meehan, Gabriel Megahey, and Colm Meehan, Defendants
See, e.g., United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 834-36 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Ranzoni (83-1518), and Robert Cuddeback (83-1590)
See also United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 837 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981) (goods stolen from dock before shipped overseas are in foreign commerce for purposes of § 2314 violation despite the fact not crossed a national border); United States v. Franklin, 568 F.2d 1156, 1157 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 955 , 98 S.Ct. 1588 , 55 L.Ed.2d 807 (1978) (court interpreting identical language of 18 U.S.C. § 659 to that used in § 2315 found fact that goods had not crossed state line before stolen irrelevant; jurisdictional requiremen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond Wayne Blue A/K/A Budagau
See also United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 839 (1981) (operating gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955 ); United States v. Olvera, 488 F.2d 607 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 917 , 94 S.Ct. 1625 , 40 L.Ed.2d 119 (1974) (possession of amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844 (a).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Don Bruce Duncan
(2×)
See also United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830 , 834 n. 3 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Belfield
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 839 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981); United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593, 607 (3rd Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1982
See also United States v. Ajlouny, 629 F.2d 830, 839 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1111 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 840 (1981).
Air Line Pilots Assn., International
v.
Stevens
v.
Stevens
No. 80-516.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 1981.
Published
Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.