green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
LaBalbo v. Hymes
Moreover, once the right, entitlement or benefit is conferred, the state "may not constitutionally authorize the deprivation of such an interest, once conferred, without appropriate procedural safeguards.” Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Louder-mill, 470 U.S. 532, 541 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1492-93 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); see also Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 , 100 S.Ct. 2502 , 65 L.Ed.2d 555 (1980) (denial of federal statutory entitlement enforceable by § 1983 action); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 262 at n. 8, 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 1018 at n. 8, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); but see 1st National Bank of O…
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis R. Baur v. United States
See United States v. Aquinas College Credit Union, 635 F.2d 887, 888 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 (1981). 4 The appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal as moot is granted.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hufsmith v. Weaver
See First National Bank of Omaha, 482 F.Supp. at 521, 524-25 (Noerr-Pennington doctrine held applicable to plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and tortious interference with business claims), aff'd per curiam, 636 F.2d 195 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 , 101 S.Ct. 1761 , 68 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981); Gorman Towers, Inc. v. Bogoslavsky, 626 F.2d 607 , 614-15 (8th Cir.1980) (Noerr-Pennington doctrine held applicable to plaintiff’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ); Missouri v. National Organization for Women, Inc., 620 F.2d 1301, 1318-19 (8th Cir.) (Noerr-Pennington doctrine held applicable …
discussed
Cited "see"
Lauritzen v. Lehman
In Premachandra, the Eighth Circuit argued that its interpretation of Sec. 2412(b) would not "swallow up" Sec. 2412(d), because in that circuit Sec. 1983 actions may only be brought for statutory violations that implicate fundamental human rights. 727 F.2d at 730; see First National Bank of Omaha v. Marquette National Bank, 636 F.2d 195, 198 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 , 101 S.Ct. 1761 , 68 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lauritzen v. Lehman
In Premachandra , the Eighth Circuit argued that its interpretation of § 2412(b) would not "swallow up” § 2412(d), because in that circuit § 1983 actions may only be brought for statutory violations that implicate fundamental human rights. 727 F.2d at 730; see First National Bank of Omaha v. Marquette National Bank, 636 F.2d 195, 198 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 , 101 S.Ct. 1761 , 68 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Kassel
See abo First National Bank of Omaha v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, 636 F.2d 195, 198 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 , 101 S.Ct. 1761 , 68 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981); Chase v. McMasters, 573 F.2d 1011, 1017 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 965 , 99 S.Ct. 453 , 58 L.Ed.2d 423 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Hollobow
See First National Bank of Omaha v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, 482 F.Supp. 514, 524 (D.Minn. 1979), aff’d, 636 F.2d 195 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 , 101 S.Ct. 1761 , 68 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981); Pennwalt Corp. v. Zenith Laboratories, Inc., 472 F.Supp. 413, 424 (E.D.Mich.1979), appeal dism’d, 615 F.2d 1362 (6th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Havoco Of America, Ltd. v. Hollobow
See First National Bank of Omaha v. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis, 482 F.Supp. 514, 524 (D.Minn.1979), aff'd, 636 F.2d 195 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 , 101 S.Ct. 1761 , 68 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981); Pennwalt Corp. v. Zenith Laboratories, Inc., 472 F.Supp. 413, 424 (E.D.Mich.1979), appeal dism'd, 615 F.2d 1362 (6th Cir.1980). 44 For purposes of this motion, the court treats as undisputed the allegations that defendants registered complaints with the SEC, that as a result the SEC conducted an investigation of Havoco or its subsidiary, and that this investigation caused Havoco …
cited
Cited "see"
City of Portland v. Tuttle
See State v. Niedermeyer, 48 Or App 665 , 617 P2d 911 , rev den 290 Or 249 (1980), cert den 450 US 1042 (1981); State v. Wesson, 40 Or App 99 , 594 P2d 429 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New York Airlines, Inc. v. Dukes County
See also First National Bank of Omaha v. Marquette National Bank, 636 F.2d 195, 198 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1042 , 101 S.Ct. 1761 , 68 L.Ed.2d 240 (1981) (holding § 1983 action limited to claims "in the nature of the rights protected by the Civil Rights Act,” including "fundamental human, highly personalized rights____”). 8 .
Williamson
v.
Kimbrough, Zoning Administrator, Dallas, Texas
v.
Kimbrough, Zoning Administrator, Dallas, Texas
No. 80-1363.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1981.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.