green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
9.6 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 2 distinct cases ·
“The function of judicial scrutiny of a committee’s recommendation is to determine independently whether the action is likely to harm the corporation rather than help it.”
cited 5× by 1 distinct case ·
“Nothing could more ‘directly affect’ the adjudication than the Opinion itself.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“An adjudication ... should ... be subject to public scrutiny.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[The business judgment rule] does not apply in cases ... tainted by a conflict of interest....”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Stoner v. Walsh
But see Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 889 (2d Cir.1982) (holding that Connecticut would decline to follow Auerbach and, therefore, that business judgment deference should not be given to the termination of derivative litigation by a special litigation committee of disinterested directors), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Anderson v. Brokers, Inc. (In Re Brokers, Inc.)
does not apply in cases ... tainted by a conflict of interest....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Video Trax, Inc. v. NationsBank, N.A.
this section simply sets forth the general corporate powers of associations. it does not provide that the powers therein are meant to preempt state law.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Encyclopedia Brown Productions, Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc.
nothing could more 'directly affect' the adjudication than the opinion itself.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Strougo on Behalf of Brazil Fund, Inc. v. Padegs
the function of judicial scrutiny of a committee's recommendation is to determine independently whether the action is likely to harm the corporation rather than help it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rosengarten v. Buckley
the function of judicial scrutiny of a committee's recommendation is to determine independently whether the action is likely to harm the corporation rather than help it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation"
an adjudication ... should ... be subject to public scrutiny.
cited
Cited "see"
Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank Ag, Bankers Trust Company
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 893 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diversified Group, Inc. v. Daugerdas
See id. (citing Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 (2d Cir.) (vacating a protective order entered with respect to a report that was material to the district court’s grant of summary judgment), cert. denied sub nom., Citytrust v. Joy, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983)); see also FTC v. Standard Fin.
discussed
Cited "see"
Irwin Stern v. Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
(2×)
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 893 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cruz
See United States v. Bosch, 914 F.2d 1239, 1241 (9th Cir.1990) (“We have ‘rejected the doctrine of legal impossibility as a defense to a charge of conspiracy.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Everett, 692 F.2d 596, 599 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983)); United States v. Brooklier, 685 F.2d 1208, 1217 (9th Cir.1982) (“[Fjactual impossibility is no defense to an inchoate offense.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1997
See United States v. Bosch, 914 F.2d 1239, 1241 (9th Cir.1990) ("We have 'rejected the doctrine of legal impossibility as a defense to a charge of conspiracy.' ") (quoting United States v. Everett, 692 F.2d 596, 599 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983)); United States v. Brooklier, 685 F.2d 1208, 1217 (9th Cir.1982) ("[F]actual impossibility is no defense to an inchoate offense."). 53 After Balajadia and Taitano had been arrested in connection with the conspiracy to transport drugs to Guam and the drugs had been seized, Mesa and Tenorio, unaware …
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Blasdell
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 886 (2d Cir.1982) (stating that the business judgment rule does not apply when the corporate decision “results from an obvious and prolonged failure to exercise oversight or supervision”), cer t. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); FDIC v. Benson, 867 F.Supp. 512, 522 (S.D.Tex.1994) (“Moreover the business judgment rule will protect a director even if the acts are ultra vires; the acts must be grossly negligent or a complete abdication of the director’s responsibility for liability to attach.”); RTC v. Acton, 844 F.Supp. 307…
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); Rushford v. New Yorker Magazine, 846 F.2d 249 (4th Cir.1988); accord In re Continental Illinois Sec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Republic of Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); Rushford v. New Yorker Magazine, 846 F.2d 249 (4th Cir.1988); accord In re Continental Illinois Sec.
discussed
Cited "see"
RCM Securities Fund, Inc. v. Stanton
See generally Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 (2d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); Zapata v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del.1981); Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rcm Securities Fund, Inc. v. Stanton
See generally Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); Zapata v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779 (Del.1981); Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parramore
See United States v. Everett, 692 F.2d 596 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); compare with United States v. Pietri, 683 F.2d 877, 879 (5th Cir.1982) (“The crime of conspiracy is complete upon the formation of the illegal agreement.
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinois v. United States
Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States, 265 U.S. 106 , 44 S.Ct. 471 , 68 L.Ed. 934 (1924); accord Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 571, 576-77 , 688 F.2d 780, 783 (1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 929 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel M. Feinberg Testamentary Trust v. Carter
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 886 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor, 500 F.Supp. 278, 293 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 654 F.2d 843 (2d Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Kent Bach v. National Western Life Insurance Co.
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 , 888 n. 7 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanson Trust PLC v. ML SCM Acquisition Inc.
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 886 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 [ 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 ] (1983) (... business imperatives often call for quick decisions). 623 F.Supp. at 858 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanson Trust Plc v. Ml Scm Acquisition Inc.
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 886 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 [ 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 ] (1983) (... business imperatives often call for quick decisions). 128 623 F.Supp. at 858 .
cited
Cited "see"
William A. Kumpf v. Orin A. Steinhaus
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 885-87 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812-15 (Del.1984); Daniel R.
cited
Cited "see"
Hanson Trust PLC v. SCM Corp.
See Joy v. North., 692 F.2d 880, 886 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983) (... business imperatives often call for quick decisions).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis Ex Rel. National Semiconductor Corp. v. Sporck
See Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 892-93 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 10S.Ct. 1498, 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaplan v. Wyatt
See, for example, Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619 , 419 N.Y.S.2d 920 , 393 N.E.2d 994 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pelosi v. Spota
Co., Ltd., 529 F.Supp. 866, 899 (E.D.Pa. 1981); see also Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 893 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983) (ruling that documents considered during the “adjudication stage” of a lawsuit “should, absent exceptional circumstances, be subject to public scrutiny.”). 8 B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drilling v. Berman
Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado, 430 A.2d 779, 789 (Del.1981); see also Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 891 (2d Cir.1982) (construing Connecticut law), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983); Abella v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Co., 546 F.Supp. 795, 799-800 (E.D.Va.1982); Watts v. Des Moines Register & Tribune, 525 F.Supp. 1311, 1326 (S.D.Iowa 1981); Strougo v. Padegs, 1 F.Supp.2d 276, 281 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (construing Maryland law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 893-94 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Louis E. Wolfson
See, e.g., Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 893-94 (2d Cir.1982) (summary judgment), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lawrence E. Wood, United States of America v. Daniel Duchaine
E.g., United States v. Tuohey, 867 F.2d 534, 536-37 (9th Cir.1989) (refusing to apply McNally in this context due to rationale in Dennis ); see also Everett, 692 F.2d at 599 (pre-McNally case stating that "[s]ection 371 does not require that the government actually be harmed"), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 (1983). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregory Alan Morton
See Span, 970 F.2d at 577 ; see also United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820, 826 (11th Cir.1982) (upholding refusal to instruct jury on self-defense where defendant who testified that he was aware that he was being detained by law enforcement officers "never testified to having been struck, kicked or assaulted” such that "any force used by the apprehending officers ... could [not] have given rise to a reasonable apprehension that such force was unlawful"), cer t. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1497 , 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
See e.g., United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820, 824-26 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1497 , 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983). 56 The compelling interests in public health and welfare that motivated the passage of legislation banning snake handling and marijuana use and persuaded the courts to uphold those laws are precisely the government interests at issue here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Spear
(CCH) 489 (1979) (Dec. 36,483(M)); 5 MERTEN’S LAW OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION § 23A.15 (1942-1988); see also United States v. Everett, 692 F.2d 596 (9th Cir.1982) (backdating tax shelter investments evidences an intent to defraud), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983), and United States v. Crum, 529 F.2d 1380 (9th Cir.1976) (same).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
NL Industries, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 571, 576-77 , 688 F.2d 780, 782-83 (1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olsen v. State of Iowa
See, e.g., United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820, 824-26 (11th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1497 , 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983); United States v. Spears, 443 F.2d 895 , 896 (5th Cir.1971) (per curiam), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1020 , 92 5.Ct. 693, 30 L.Ed.2d 669 (1972); Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851, 859-61 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d on other grounds, 395 U.S. 6, 54 , 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1557 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969); Randall v. Wyrick, 441 F.Supp. 312, 315-16 (W.D.Mo.1977); United States v. Kuch, 288 F.Supp. 439, 446 (D.D.C.1968); and cases cited in State v. Olsen, 315 N.W.2d at…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berniece Larimore, Sam M. Taylor, William G. Butcher, and Orville Bottrell v. C.T. Conover, Comptroller of the Currency
(2×)
See White v. Thomas, 37 F.2d at 454 ; see also Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 896 (2d Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perdue v. Crocker National Bank
Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. (1934) 292 U.S. 559, 566 [ 78 L.Ed. 1425, 1431 , 54 S.Ct. 848 , 92 A.L.R. 794 ]; First Nat’l Bank v. Missouri (1924) 263 U.S. 640 [ 68 L.Ed. 486 , 44 S.Ct. 213 ]; Nat’l State Bank v. Long (3d Cir. 1980) 630 F.2d 981, 985-986 ; Brown v. United Community Nat’l Bank (D.D.C. 1968) 282 F.Supp. 781, 783 ; South Dakota v. Nat’l Bank (D.S.D. 1963) 219 F. Supp. 842, 844-845 , affirmed (8th Cir. 1964) 335 F.2d 444 , certiorari denied (1965) 379 U.S. 970 [ 13 L.Ed.2d 562 , 85 S.Ct. 667 ], The test has sometimes been phrased more loosely; see, e.g., Anderson Nat’l…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
FIRST SAVINGS AND LOAN INSURANCE v. Alexander
See also Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 896 (2nd Cir. 1982), cert, denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983). 1 In addition, *839 defendants have not supported, by affidavit or otherwise, the allegation that FHB was aware of Kersting’s reputation.
Performance Products, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-2402.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 28, 1983.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2) · S.D. Florida (1) · D. Maryland (1) · M.D. North Carolina (1) · E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.