green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“he statute, therefore, precludes judicial review of propriety ... in any event, based upon our respect for the basic polity of separation of powers and the proper exercise of judicialre-straint, we will not intrude into the wholly internal affairs of the legislature”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ackerman v. Berkowitz
he statute, therefore, precludes judicial review of propriety ... in any event, based upon our respect for the basic polity of separation of powers and the proper exercise of judicialre-straint, we will not intrude into the wholly internal affairs of the legislature
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See Wilson v. Block, 708 F.2d 735, 751 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 371 , 78 L.Ed.2d 330 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. State
The judge decided to give the instruction. [1] Discussion Jury instructions requested by the State "must relate to issues concerning evidence received at trial." Butler v. State, 493 So.2d 451, 452 (Fla.1986); accord Buford v. Wainwright, 428 So.2d 1389, 1390-91 (Fla.) ("Only instructions which have support in the record should be given to the jury."), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 372 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Griffin v. State, 370 So.2d 860, 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(a charge requires an "appropriate factual basis in the record").
discussed
Cited "see"
Rawls v. State
See Buford v. Wainwright, 428 So.2d 1389, 1390 (Fla.) (objection to erroneous instruction properly preserved where counsel objected during charge conference), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 372 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association, Inc., D/B/A Marva Maid Dairy
See United States v. Basic Construction Co., 711 F.2d 570, 573 (4th Cir.) (corporation criminally responsible under the Sherman Act for antitrust violations committed by employee if employee acts within the scope of his authority, or apparent authority, and for the benefit of the corporation, even if against corporate policy), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 (1983). 10 69 Marva Maid contends its economic data offered at trial negates any inference that Elliott intended to violate the Sherman Act.
cited
Cited "see"
Yonkers Racing Corp. v. City of Yonkers
See Wilson v. Block, 708 F.2d 735 , 742 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.) (Lumbard, J., sitting by designation) (distinguishing Pillar of Fire), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 371 , 78 L.Ed.2d 330 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Yonkers Racing Corporation v. City Of Yonkers
See Wilson v. Block, 708 F.2d 735 , 742 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.) (Lumbard, J., sitting by designation) (distinguishing Pillar of Fire ), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 371 , 78 L.Ed.2d 330 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
C & W Construction Co. v. Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 745
See Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1266 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Jeanery, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, and Rock Bottom Jean Co., Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. James Jeans, Inc., a Washington Corporation
(2×)
See Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1265 (9th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Sweeney, 637 F.2d at 115-16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Informal Opinion No.
Under section 1210 of the Tax Law, counties are authorized to impose a sales and use tax at one-half percent increments up to three percent (section 1210 also permits certain counties and cities to impose higher rates). * Section 1109 of the Tax Law imposes an additional one-quarter percent sales tax, above and beyond the tax rate set pursuant to section 1210, in the counties within the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District (Tax Law, § 1109 [a]; see, Heimbach v State, 59 N.Y.2d 891 , app dsmd 464 U.S. 956 [1983]).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1986
See Wilson v. Block, 708 F.2d 735, 742-44 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 371 , 78 L.Ed.2d 330 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n v. Peterson
See Wilson v. Block, 708 F.2d 735, 742-44 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 371 , 78 L.Ed.2d 330 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Samaritan Health Center v. Heckler
See Wilson v. Block, 708 F.2d 735, 750 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 371 , 78 L.Ed.2d 330 (1983) and sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Leila J. Goldstein
See United States v. Koppers Co., 652 F.2d at 298 ; see also United States v. Basic Construction Co., 711 F.2d 570, 573 (4th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 371 , 78 L.Ed.2d 330 (1983); United States v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 467 F.2d 1000, 1004-07 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125 , 93 S.Ct. 938 , 35 L.Ed.2d 256 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Earle v. Robert Benoit
See, e.g., Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1267 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 80-81 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981); SEC v. Tome, 638 F.Supp. 629, 633 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tome
Rule 1101(b), Fed.R.Evid.; see e.g., Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 709 F.2d 1257, 1267 (9th Cir.) (discussing coconspirator exclusion in a civil case), cert. dismissed, 464 U.S. 956 , 104 S.Ct. 385 , 78 L.Ed.2d 331 (1983); Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 639 F.2d 75, 80-81 (2d Cir.1980) (same), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1083 , 102 S.Ct. 639 , 70 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).
Basic Construction Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-272.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 1983.
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.