green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.4 score
“section 135(c) requires that any agreement or understanding made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of an interference must be filed with the .”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Schubert & Salzer Maschinenfabrik Aktiengesellschaft v. W. Schlafhorst & Co., American Schlafhorst Company, and Greenwood Mills, Inc.
section 135(c) requires that any agreement or understanding made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of an interference must be filed with the .
cited
Cited "see"
Todd v. Hawk
Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); see Boileau v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 730 F.2d 929, 938 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1993
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512 , 220 USPQ 929, 936 (Fed.Cir.) (reviewed district court's denial of motion for new trial for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Fiber-Lite Corp. v. Molded Acoustical Products, Inc. (In Re Molded Acoustical Products, Inc.)
See Boileau v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 730 F.2d 929, 939 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ven-Tel, Inc. v. Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc.
(2×)
Fact findings reviewed under the substantial evidence standard require affirmance unless appellant shows that no reasonable juror could have reached such a result. 5 Id.; see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512-13 , 220 USPQ 929, 936 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
cafc 1992
(2×)
Fact findings reviewed under the substantial evidence standard require affirmance unless appellant shows that no reasonable juror could have reached such a result. 5 Id.; see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512-13 , 220 USPQ 929, 936 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. And Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
Delaware Valley II, 755 F.2d at 41 ; accord CTS Corp. v. Piher International Corp., 727 F.2d 1550, 1555 , 221 USPQ 11, 14 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984) (applying abuse of discretion standard of review to Rule 60(b)(6) ruling).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Furlett
See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 730 F.2d 1103, 1106 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984) (noting that Commodities Exchange Act creates a comprehensive regulatory scheme in order to effectuate the act’s goal of ensuring “fair practice and honest dealings on the commodity exchanges”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Gordon
See United States v. Reed, 726 F.2d 570 (9th Cir.) (defendant's admissions are nonhearsay apart from the co-conspirator exception), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc.
(2×)
Randall, Inc. v. AFA Protective Sys., 516 F.Supp. 1122, 1124 (E.D.Pa.1981) (citations omitted), aff'd, 688 F.2d 820 (3d Cir.1982); accord *1082 Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 579 F.Supp. 353, 358 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff'd, 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Capeletti Bros. v. Metropolitan Dade County
(2×)
See South Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, 552 F.Supp. 909 (S.D.Fla.1982), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 723 F.2d 846 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Harris Press & Shear Division and Commercial Metals Company
(2×)
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1519 , 220 USPQ 929, 941 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984) (in lost profits context: “One who fails to submit evidence in support of a position cannot be heard on appeal to complain that the trial court failed to find facts upholding that position”); Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 667 F.2d 347, 363 , 212 USPQ 643, 657 (3rd Cir.1981) (affirming award of zero damages for lack of evidence and saying: “The statute [ 35 U.S.C. § 284 ] requires the award of a reasonable royalty, but…
examined
Cited "see"
Senmed, Inc. And Ethicon, Inc. v. Richard-Allan Medical Industries, Inc.
(3×)
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1515-17 , 220 USPQ 929, 938-39 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 , 224 USPQ 520 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Dean Hedgcorth, United States of America v. Franklin Joseph Camper
See United States v. Reed, 726 F.2d 570, 576 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Altenberg v. Frankford Trust Co. (In Re Railroad Dynamics, Inc.)
(4×)
See 579 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.Pa. 1983), affd, 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
(2×)
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Devex Corporation v. General Motors Corporation
(2×)
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 8 Plaintiff filed its 1986 appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald L. Snellman D/B/A Norfin v. Ricoh Company Ltd.
(2×)
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1511 , 220 USPQ 929, 934 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Balmer
(2×)
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
See Tamari v. Bache & Co. (Lebanon) S.A.L., 730 F.2d 1103 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984) (dispute between Lebanese citizens and a Lebanese corporation over the court’s subject matter jurisdiction as derived from a congressional statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kloster Speedsteel Ab v. Crucible Inc.
On this record, Stora has shown no "basis on which this court could engage in the normally inappropriate process of substituting a contrary credibility determination for that of the district court." Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF Inc., 782 F.2d 995, 999 , 228 USPQ 562, 565 (Fed.Cir.1986); see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1514 , 220 USPQ 929, 937 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). 41 Moreover, the district court met Stora's contentions head-on, rejecting, for example, its argument that Reen did not have to warn aga…
discussed
Cited "see"
A. Stucki Co. v. Schwam
(2×)
See Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Company, 579 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.Pa.1983), aff 'd, 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible Inc.
On this record, Stora has shown no “basis on which this court could engage in the normally inappropriate process of substituting a contrary credibility determination for that of the district court.” Windsurfing International, Inc. v. AMF Inc., 782 F.2d 995, 999 , 228 USPQ 562, 565 (Fed.Cir.1986); see Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1514 , 220 USPQ 929, 937 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Darda Inc. USA v. Majorette Toys (U.S.) Inc.
See, Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 , 220 USPQ 929 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984); Hycor Corp. v. Schlueter Co., 740 F.2d 1529 , 222 USPQ 553 (Fed.Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.
(2×)
Dataline Corp. v. Micro Technologies, Inc., 813 F.2d 1196, 1200 (Fed.Cir.1987) (citing Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computer Vision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984)); see also Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 , 1512 *1050 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). “ ‘Substantial evidence’ is such relevant evidence from the record taken as a whole as might be accepted by a reasonable mind as adequate to support the finding under review.” Fonar Corp. v. Johnson & Jo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terrance Frank
(2×)
See e.g., United States v. Reed, 726 F.2d 570, 579 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984); United States v. Briscoe, 574 F.2d 406, 408 (8th Cir.1978) (“The penalty to be imposed upon a convicted defendant is generally not a matter for the jury, and it is proper to caution the jury against any consideration of possible punishment in their deliberations.”), cer t. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 173 , 58 L.Ed.2d 165 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.
(2×)
Corp., 833 F.2d 1352 , 1356 n. 2 (9th Cir.1987) (no review of denial of directed verdict); cf. Kopczynski v. The Jacqueline, 742 F.2d 555, 560 (9th Cir.1984) (question of direct review of denial of directed verdict not passed on), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1136 , 105 S.Ct. 2677 , 86 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985); see also Borger v. Yamaha Int’l Corp., 625 F.2d 390, 394-95 (2d Cir.1980) ("Borger’s contends that Yamaha’s failure to move within ten days for judgment n. o. v. as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b) precludes it from seeking appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terrance Frank
See e.g., United States v. Reed, 726 F.2d 570, 579 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 151 (1984); United States v. Briscoe, 574 F.2d 406, 408 (8th Cir.1978) (“The penalty to be imposed upon a convicted defendant is generally not a matter for the jury, and it is proper to caution the jury against any consideration of possible punishment in their deliberations.”), cer t. denied, 439 U.S. 858 , 99 S.Ct. 173 , 58 L.Ed.2d 165 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.
(2×)
See, e.g., Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1518 , 220 USPQ 929, 940 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sun Studs, Inc. v. Ata Equipment Leasing, Inc., Applied Theory, Inc. And U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants
(2×)
See also, e.g., Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512 , 220 USPQ 929, 935 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984) (whether motion denied or granted, review follows the path trod by the district court); 5A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 50.07[2] (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States Gypsum
See, e.g., Boileau v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., et al., 730 F.2d 929 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 221 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984); Howze v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 750 F.2d 1208, 1212 (3d Cir.1984); Heyl & Patterson Int’l v. F.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.
(2×)
See, e. g., South Florida Chapter, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 723 F. 2d 846 (CA11), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 871 (1984); Ohio Contractors Assn. v. Keip, 713 F. 2d 167 (CA6 1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
HB Fuller Co. v. National Starch and Chemical Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1518 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984).
Railroad Dynamics, Inc.
v.
A. Stucki Co.
v.
A. Stucki Co.
No. 83-1839.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Motion of respondent for damages denied. Certiorari denied.