green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“we are persuaded that the sufficiency of notice to a person's lawyer is so ingrained that we should expect congress to say so if it intends a different rule.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lewis v. United States
But cf. United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1506 (7th Cir.1989) (warrantless search of vehicle which police officers followed before they initiated contact with appellants, which was after appellants had pulled over and parked it, held valid as incident to subsequent arrest one block away), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990). 8 .
cited
Cited "but see"
Sargeant v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union 478 Health Benefits & Insurance Fund
But see, e.g., FMC Corp. v. Holliday, 885 F.2d 79, 89-90 (3d Cir.1989), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1109 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dr. G.V v. Rao v. James A. Baker, Secretary of State
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
we are persuaded that the sufficiency of notice to a person's lawyer is so ingrained that we should expect congress to say so if it intends a different rule.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bomas v. State
See United States v. Alexander, 816 F.2d 164, 167 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1110 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1018 (1990) (generally inadmissible except when the case depends primarily on eyewitness identification); State v. Chappie, 135 Ariz. 281 , 660 P.2d 1208, 1223-23 (1983). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Banks
See United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501 , 1507 n. 2 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990) (holding that even if search revealing trap was not justified as search incident to arrest, it was justified as a lawful inventory search); United States v. Lomeli, No. 94 CR 173-1, 1995 WL 248039 , *2, 1995 U.S.Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Savedra
See United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1506 (7th Cir.1989) (finding search of vehicle valid where defendant had left car moments before confrontation with police began), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990); United States v. Schecter, 717 F.2d 864, 868 (3d Cir.1983) (applying Belton where police contacted defendant stumbling outside his car under the influence of drugs shortly after he had driven it into a fence); People v. Stoffle, 1 Cal.App.4th 1671 , 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 257, 261 (1991) (holding Belton applicable where police contacted and arrested defendant…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry A. Moore
See United States v. Alexander, 869 F.2d 808, 811 (5th Cir.1989) (continuance properly denied where defendant suffered from acute anxiety, but had no disease or defect which would prevent him from testifying or assisting in his defense), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1110 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1018 (1990). 1 This conclusion was borne out by the court’s observations during the first day of trial that, notwithstanding a need for frequent urination that ultimately prompted Moore to have himself catheterized, Moore did not appear to be in any acute distress and consulted with his counsel throu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Georgetown Manor, Inc. v. Ethan Allen, Inc.
See United States v. Rodriguez-Cardenas, 866 F.2d 390, 394 (11th Cir.1989) (recognizing that this court will not disturb an evidentiary ruling absent a clear showing that the district court abused its discretion), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1110 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990); United States v. Peaden, 727 F.2d 1493, 1500 (11th Cir.) (noting that rule 403 is the appropriate standard of reviewing a district court’s admission of a statement for a non-hearsay purpose of rule 801(c), and setting forth the two limited categories of cases warranting reversal under that standard), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1993
See United States v. Rodriguez-Cardenas, 866 F.2d 390, 394 (11th Cir.1989) (recognizing that this court will not disturb an evidentiary ruling absent a clear showing that the district court abused its discretion), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1110 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990); United States v. Peaden, 727 F.2d 1493, 1500 (11th Cir.) (noting that rule 403 is the appropriate standard of reviewing a district court's admission of a statement for a non-hearsay purpose of rule 801(c), and setting forth the two limited categories of cases warranting reversal under that standard), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coyaso
See United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 (1990) (court noted that defendant had not demonstrated actual prejudice by delay and dismissal with prejudice would not serve to discourage neglect or bad faith in prosecution).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evelyn J. WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manuel LUJAN, Jr., Secretary, Department of the Interior, Defendant-Appellee
See Irwin v. Veterans Administration, 874 F.2d 1092 (5th Cir.1989), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1109 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990); Brown v. Department of the Army, 854 F.2d 77 (5th Cir.1988); Bell v. Veterans Administration Hospital, 826 F.2d 357 (5th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lopez v. Louisiana National Guard
See Irwin v. Veterans Administration, 874 F.2d 1092, 1095 (5th Cir.1989) (Brown bars such claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1109 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990); Porter v. Adams, 639 F.2d 273, 278 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (same for such Bivens actions); Newbold v. United States Postal Service, 614 F.2d 46, 47 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (same for such claims "under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq."), reh’g denied mem., 616 F.2d 568 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 878 , 101 S.Ct. 225 , 66 L.Ed.2d 101 (1980); see also Hunter v. Stetson, 444 F.Supp. 238 , 239 n. 1 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lyle Pierce
Compare United States v. Russo, 741 F.2d 1264, 1267 (11th Cir.1984) (where neither party caused the delay, the presumption is for dismissal with prejudice) with United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1601 , 1608 (7th Cir.1989) (where neither party caused the delay/ the presumption is for dismissal without prejudice), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert M. Farrell v. Leoneal Davis, Warden
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez-Cardenas, 866 F.2d 390, 392 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1110 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Erickson
See, e.g., United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1505-06 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990); United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 970-72 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
James H. Bell, Jr. v. Dennis Baker
(3×)
See, e.g., United States v. Rodriquez-Cardenas, 866 F.2d 390, 393 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1110 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990); Teague v. Lane, 820 F.2d 832, 841 (7th Cir.1987) (en banc), aff'd, 489 U.S. 288 , 109 S.Ct. 1060 , 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989); United States v. Salamone, 800 F.2d 1216, 1219 (3d Cir.1986); United States v. Thompson, 730 F.2d 82 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1024 , 105 S.Ct. 443 , 83 L.Ed.2d 369 (1984); Weathersby v. Morris, 708 F.2d 1493, 1497 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1046 , 104 S.Ct. 719 , 79 L.Ed.2d 181 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore K. Gale
The drugs removed from appellant’s person and automobile trunk would certainly have been discovered when the police searched his person incident to his arrest, see United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 467, 477 , 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973) (war-rantless search of person valid when incident to custodial arrest), and his car pursuant to a post-impoundment inventory search, see South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 372 , 96 S.Ct. 3092, 3099 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976) (upholding warrantless inventory search of lawfully impounded car); see also United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nejdl
See, e.g., United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501 (7th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990) (dismissal without prejudice involving a violation of three months); United States v. Simmons, 786 F.2d 479 (2nd Cir.1986) (dismissal without prejudice involving a violation of up to four months); United States v. Brown, 770 F.2d 241 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 816 , 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986) (dismissal without prejudice involving a violation of 35 days).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. Waller, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. Mary J. Waller
Compare FMC Corp. v. Holliday, 885 F.2d 79, 89-90 (3d Cir.1989) (ERISA did not preempt Pennsylvania anti-sub-rogation provision because law did not address a "core type of ERISA matter”), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1109 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1990), with United Food & Commercial Workers & Employers Arizona Health & Welfare Trust v. Pacyga, 801 F.2d 1157, 1160 (9th Cir.1986) (Arizona’s anti-subrogation law “relates to” benefit plans and so is preempted). *990 We are saved from weighing in on the issue because we conclude that no subrogation situation is presented here.
Irwin
v.
Department of Veterans Affairs
v.
Department of Veterans Affairs
No. 89-5867.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1990.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.