green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca9 1997
But see Lauer v. United States, 968 F.2d 1428, 1430 (1st Cir.) (holding that suit by serviceman alleging inadequate lighting of road maintained by Navy outside base causing serviceman to be hit by car while off-duty and walking on the road was Feres barred because "the question of whether to light a highway is a military decision"), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 685 (1992); Miller v. United States, 643 F.2d 481, 494 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc ) (holding that family of serviceman performing off-duty work for private contractor who was killed when his ladder came in cont…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dreier v. United States
But see Lauer v. United States, 968 F.2d 1428, 1430 (1st Cir.) (holding that suit by serviceman alleging inadequate lighting of road maintained by Navy outside base causing serviceman to be hit by car while off-duty and walking on the road was Feres barred because "the question of whether to light a highway is a military decision”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 685 (1992); Miller v. United States, 643 F.2d 481, 494 (8th Cir.1981) ( en banc) (holding that family of serviceman performing off-duty work for private contractor who was killed when his ladder came in co…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dreier v. United States
But see Lauer v. United States, 968 F.2d 1428, 1430 (1st Cir.) (holding that suit by serviceman alleging inadequate lighting of road maintained by Navy outside base causing serviceman to be hit by car while off-duty and walking on the road was Feres barred because "the question of whether to light a highway is a military decision"), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 685 (1992); Miller v. United States, 643 F.2d 481, 494 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc) (holding that family of serviceman performing off-duty work for private contractor who was killed when his ladder came in conta…
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca9 1996
But see Lauer v. United States, 968 F.2d 1428, 1430 (1st Cir.) (holding that suit by serviceman alleging inadequate lighting of road maintained by Navy outside base causing serviceman to be hit by car while off-duty and walking on the road was Feres barred because "the question of whether to light a highway is a military decision"), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 685 (1992); Miller v. United States, 643 F.2d 481, 494 (8th Cir.1981) (en banc ) (holding that family of serviceman performing off-duty work for private contractor who was killed when his ladder came in cont…
cited
Cited "see"
Huss v. Green Spring Health Services, Inc.
See Corcoran v. United HealthCare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321, 1331 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 684 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrews-Clarke v. Travelers Insurance
See Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321, 1323 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 684 (1992) (citations omitted); Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350 , 352 n. 1 (3rd Cir.1995), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995); Jennifer A. Hradil, Comment, Patchwork Patient Protection: Must We Choose a Single Pattern?, 27 Seton Hall L.Rev. 203, 210-11 & n. 32 (1996). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. Humana Kansas City, Inc.
See Corcoran v. United HealthCare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 684 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cannon v. Group Health Service of Oklahoma, Inc.
See Corcoran v. United HealthCare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321, 1333 (5th Cir.) (“While we are not unmindful of the fact that our interpretation of the preemption clause leaves a gap in remedies within a statute intended to protect participants in employee benefit plans, the lack of an ERISA remedy does not affect a pre-emption analysis.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 684 (1992); Cromwell v. Equicor HCA Corp., 944 F.2d 1272, 1276 (6th Cir.1991) (“Nor is it relevant to an analysis of the scope of federal preemption that appellants may be left without a remedy.”), c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cannon v. Group Health Service Of Oklahoma
See Corcoran v. United HealthCare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321, 1333 (5th Cir.) ("While we are not unmindful of the fact that our interpretation of the preemption clause leaves a gap in remedies within a statute intended to protect participants in employee benefit plans, the lack of an ERISA remedy does not affect a pre-emption analysis."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 684 (1992); Cromwell v. Equicor HCA Corp., 944 F.2d 1272, 1276 (6th Cir.1991) ("Nor is it relevant to an analysis of the scope of federal preemption that appellants may be left without a remedy."), cert. den…
Wisconsin
v.
Mitchell
v.
Mitchell
No. 92-515.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1992.
Published
Sup. Ct. Wis. Motion of Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari granted.