green
Positive treatment
7.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. Texas Instruments Incorporated
(2×)
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1574 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied 511 U.S. 1031 , 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
examined
Cited "see"
Ernster v. Luxco, Inc.
(4×)
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Mustek Sys., Inc., 340 F.3d 1314, 1325 (Fed.Cir.2003) (quotation omitted); see Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557 , 1561-62 & n. 3 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1031 , 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994). .In entering judgment, the court checked the box on the form stating, "The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict." The court did not make findings of fact or conclusions of law, either in entering judgment on the verdict or in denying Ernster’s motion for a new trial or judgment as a matter of law.
cited
Cited "see"
Continental Coal, Inc. v. Cunningham
See Winters v. Bd. County Comm’rs, 4 F.3d 848 , 856 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1031 , 114 S.Ct. 1539 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994); Walden v. Carmack, 156 F.3d 861, 874 (8th Cir.1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. Mustek Systems, Inc. And Mustek, Inc.
(4×)
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1563 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1031 , 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Asa-Brandt, Inc. v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.
(2×)
Lachmund, 191 F.3d at 786; accord Grain Land Coop. 199 F.3d at 990 n. 5 (quoting with approval the same segment of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’s decision in Salomon Forex, Inc. v. Tauber, 8 F.3d 966 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1031 , 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bombalicki v. Pastore, No. 378772 (Feb. 28, 2001)
See Nunez v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 147 F.3d at 872 (collecting authorities). "[T]he only remedy a Civil Service examinee in the competitive class is entitled to for defects in the appointive or promotional process such as CT Page 3089 that presented here is not appointment or promotion, but a judicial direction for reconsideration after the prior defect has been corrected." Andriola v. Ortiz, 624 N.E.2d 667 , 669 (N.Y. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1031 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Alex R. Bellehumeur v. J.B. Marketing, Inc. And Jerome Bonnett
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1569 , 28 USPQ2d 1081, 1091 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1540 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Instruments Incorporated v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Lsi Logic Corporation, and Vlsi Technology, Inc.
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1566-75 , 28 USPQ2d 1081, 1089-97 (Fed.Cir.1993) (affirming the trial judge’s exclusion of evidence concerning other litigation involving the same patents), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Century Wrecker Corp. v. E.R. Buske Manufacturing Co.
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1568 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert W. Kearns, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chrysler Corporation, and American Motors Corporation
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1569 , 28 USPQ2d 1081, 1091 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994). 1.
cited
Cited "see"
cafc 1994
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557 , 28 USPQ2d 1081 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557 , 28 USPQ2d 1081 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United States
See Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.Sd 1557 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Noble Wealth Data Information Services, Inc.
(2×)
Dunn v. CFTC, 519 U.S. 465, 472 , 117 S.Ct. 913 , 137 L.Ed.2d 93 (1997); see also Salomon Forex, Inc. v. Tauber, 8 F.3d 966, 970 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1031 , 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994) (spot transactions are transactions for the immediate sale and delivery of a commodity).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Bremer
(2×)
Co. v. Morton Int'l Inc., 508 U.S. 83 , 113 S.Ct. 1967 , 124 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993); see also Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1562 (Fed.Cir. 1993) (noting this requirement), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1031 , 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Frankwell Bullion Ltd.
See, e.g., Salomon Forex, Inc. v. Tauber, 8 F.3d 966 , 973 n. 5 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994) (declining to address the issue of whether Salo-mon Forex is a "board of trade”); see also CFTC v. American Bd. of Trade, Inc., 803 F.2d 1242 , 1249 (2d Cir.1986) (interpreting “transactions in foreign currency” to exclude only banks and other sophisticated investors); Board of Trade v. SEC, 677 F.2d 1137 , 1154 (7th Cir.), vacated as moot, 459 U.S. 1026 , 103 S.Ct. 434 , 74 L.Ed.2d 594 (1982) (same); CFTC v. Sterling Capital Co., Comm.Fut.L.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David v. Mosley
See e.g., Salomon Forex, Inc. v. Tauber, 8 F.3d 966, 975 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994); Brown v. Virginia Dept. of Corrections, 886 F.Supp. 531, 535 (E.D.Va.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cedarapids, Inc. Ex Rel. El-Jay Division v. Nordberg, Inc.
Co. v. Morton Int'l, Inc., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1967 , 124 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993); see also Mendenhall v. Cedarapids, Inc., 5 F.3d 1557, 1562 (Fed.Cir.1993) (noting this requirement), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1540 , 128 L.Ed.2d 192 (1994).
Mendenhall
v.
Cedarapids, Inc.
v.
Cedarapids, Inc.
No. 93-1319.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1994.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.