Boylan v. United States, 257 U.S. 614 (1921).

Boylan v. United States, 257 U.S. 614 (1921). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

neutral Cited (no substantive treatment) 0.3 score

6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 6

Treatment by court

ca3	0R/0Y/0G	2
connappct	0R/0Y/0G	2
nywd	0R/0Y/0G	2

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Julia Boylan
v.
United States

No. 111.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Nov 7, 1921.

257 U.S. 614

42 S. Ct. 113

66 L. Ed. 397

1921 U.S. LEXIS 1363

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Mr. William F. Santry and Mr. E. Leland Hunt for plaintiffs in error., Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Biter for the United States.

Cited by 2 opinions | Published

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, due to failure to apply for writ of error within the statutory period which began with the date of the entry of the final judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals" to which the writ of error issued, and not with date of the entry of the judgment in the District Court under the mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals. Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726, 727.