Ex parte Barker, 267 U.S. 577 (1925). · Go Syfert
Search
Ex parte Barker, 267 U.S. 577 (1925). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Lester Genser and Lawrence Forman (ca3, 1978-08-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1927 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1927 1976 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lester Genser and Lawrence Forman
3rd Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank v. United States, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 (1925), aff’g 295 F. 142 (S.D.Ala.1924).
cited Cited "see" STATE BY & THROUGH DORGAN v. Union State Bank
N.D. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank v. United States, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 (1925), aff’g, 295 F. 142 (S.D.Ala.1924).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Frank C. Hilton
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank v. United States, 267 U.S. 576 [ 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 ] (1925), aff’g 295 F. 142 (S.D.Ala.1924); Donaldson v. United States, supra, [ 400 U.S. 517 (1971)] at 522 [ 91 S.Ct. 534 at 538 , 27 L.Ed.2d 580 at 584 ]. ‘[I]f is difficult to see how the summoning of a third party, and the records of a third party, can violate the rights of the taxpayer, even if a criminal prosecution is contemplated or in progress.’ Id., at 537 [ 91 S.Ct. at 545 , 27 L.Ed.2d at 593 ] (Douglas, J., concurring).” 416 U.S. at 53 , 94 S.Ct. at 1513 , 39 L.Ed.2d at 835 . (emphasis supp…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William L. Riddick and Thomas B. Wallace
8th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank v. United States, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 (1925), aff’g 295 F. 142 (S.D.Ala.1924); Donaldson v. United States, supra, 400 U.S. 517 at 522 , 91 S.Ct. 534, 538 , 27 L.Ed.2d 580 (1971). “[I]t is difficult to see how the summoning of a third party, and the records of a third party, can violate the rights of the taxpayer, even if a criminal prosecution is contemplated or in progress.” Id., 400 U.S. at 537 , 91 S.Ct. 534 (Douglas, J., concurring).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mitchell Miller, Susan McDuffie Weeks, and John Henry McDuffie
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank v. United States, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 (1925), aff’g 295 F. 142 (S.D.Ala.1924); Donaldson v. United States, 400 U.S. 517, 522 , 91 S.Ct. 534, 538 , 27 L.Ed.2d 580 (1971). “[I]t is difficult to see how the summoning of a third party, and the records of a third party, can violate the rights of taxpayer, even if a criminal prosecution is contemplated or in progress.” Donaldson v. United States, supra, at 537, 91 S.Ct. at 545 (Douglas, J., concurring). 416 U.S. at 53 , 94 S.Ct. at 1513 , 39 L.Ed.2d at 835 . 8 Although the Court recognized that th…
discussed Cited "see" Cook v. United States
D. Nev. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank v. United States, 267 U.S. 576 [ 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 ] (1925), aff’g 295 F. 142 (SD Ala.1924); Donaldson v. United States, supra, 400 U.S. 517, 522 , [ 91 S.Ct. 534, 538 , 27 L.Ed.2d 580 .] (1971) “[I]t is difficult to see how the summoning of a third party, and the records of a third party, can violate the rights of the taxpayer, even if a criminal prosecution is contemplated or in progress.” [400 U.S.] at 537 [, 91 S.Ct. at 545 ] (Douglas, J., concurring).
discussed Cited "see" Broome v. Simon
W.D. La. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. First National Bank of Mobile, D.C.Ala.1924, 295 F. 142 , affirmed 45 S.Ct. 231 , 267 U.S. 576 , 69 L.Ed. 796 , pertaining to bank records and United States v. Austrew, U.S.D.C.Md., 1962, 202 F.Supp. 816 , affirmed 4 Cir., 317 F.2d 926 ; United States v. Laughlin, D.C.1964, 226 F.Supp. 112 , pertaining to records of telephone calls.
cited Cited "see" In re Colton
2d Cir. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank of Mobile, Ala. v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 .
cited Cited "see" Application of Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman, to Quash a Summons to Appear to Testify and to Produce Books, Etc., Relating to the Tax Liability of Herbert Matter and Mercedes Matter. Internal Revenue Service of the United States Treasury Department
2d Cir. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See First National Bank of Mobile, Ala. v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Frank L. Silverman
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Donaldson v. United States, 400 U.S. 517, 522 , 91 S.Ct. 534 , 27 L.Ed.2d 580 (1971), citing First Nat’l Bank of Mobile v. United States, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 (1925), aff’g 295 F. 142, 143 (S.D.Ala.1924); Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 491-492 , 83 S.Ct. 407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963); United States v. Beigel, 370 F.2d 751, 756 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 930 , 87 S.Ct. 2049 , 18 L.Ed.2d 989 (1967); Foster v. United States, 265 F.2d 183 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 1297 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1261 (1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Royal G. Bouschor v. United States
8th Cir. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, where appealability seems to have been assumed sub silentio, First National Bank of Mobile, Ala. v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 576 , 45 S.Ct. 231 , 69 L.Ed. 796 , affirming 5 Cir., 295 F. 142 ; Wall v. Mitchell, 4 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 31 ; Eberhart v. Broadrock Development Corp., 6 Cir., 1961, 296 F.2d 685 , cert. denied 369 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 1139 , 8 L.Ed.2d 275 ; In re Fahey, 6 Cir., 1961, 300 F.2d 383 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ex parte Barker
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 2, 1925.
267 U.S. 577
Published
Per Curiam.

Application for leave to file petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied, upon the authority of section 338 of the Criminal Code; United States v. Pridgeon, 153 U. S. 48, 63; Application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.