Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528 (1932). · Go Syfert
Search
Lavine v. California, 286 U.S. 528 (1932). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1932 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1932 1979 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lavine
v.
California
No. 786.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 25, 1932.
286 U.S. 528
Messrs. Morris Lavine and Francis Forrest Murray for appellants., Mr. U. S. Webb, Attorney General of California, for appellee.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U. S. 86, 108-111; Fox v. Washington, 236 U. S. 273, 277, 278; Miller v. Strahl, 239 U. S. 426, 434; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U. S. 343, 348; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497, 501, 502, 503. In so far as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek review of the rulings of the District Court of Appeal upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution by the proceedings at the trial of this cause, not involving the validity of any statute of the state, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari (§ 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 938), and certiorari is denied.

Mr. U. S. Webb, Attorney General of California, for appellee.