green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Lieberman v. Howard Johnson's Inc.
But see Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery, 102 F. 2d 58 (7th Cir., 1939), cert. denied, 307 U. S. 648 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
See Illinois Bell Telephone v. Slattery, 102 F.2d 58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 307 U.S. 648 , 59 S.Ct. 1045 , 83 L.Ed. 1527 (1939) 21 As previously discussed, it would also be possible to order separate consideration of the question of damages 22 See footnote 12, supra 23 See Kaplan, Continuing Work of the Civil Committee: 1966 Amendments of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (I), 81 Harv.L.Rev. 356, 398 (1967); Frankel, Amended Rule 23 From a Judge's Point of View, Symposium on Amended Rule 23, 32 A.B.A.
cited
Cited "see"
Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
See Illinois Bell Telephone v. Slattery, 102 F.2d 58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 307 U.S. 648 , 59 S.Ct. 1045 , 83 L.Ed. 1527 (1939). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.
See also Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery, 102 F.2d 58 (7th Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 648 , 59 5.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Slattery
v.
Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
v.
Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
No. 965.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 5, 1939.
Messrs. John E. Cas-sidy, Montgomery S. Winning, and Harry R. Booth for petitioners. Messrs. Kenneth F. Burgess, Leslie N. J ones, and W. Clyde Jones for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.