green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2001 ·
…onviction of a crime may be made the conclusive test of past behaviour.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Schmidt
onviction of a crime may be made the conclusive test of past behaviour.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Schmidt
onviction of a crime may be made the conclusive test of past behaviour.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Schmidt
See also Stanphill, 134 Wash.2d at 170 , 949 P.2d 365 ("the application of determinate sentencing to a pre-SRA offender" is "substantive" where it "alters the sentencing scheme"). [13] Weaver, 450 U.S. at 29 , 101 S.Ct. 960 ; Aho, 137 Wash.2d at 742 , 975 P.2d 512 ; Stanphill, 134 Wash.2d at 170 , 949 P.2d 365 ; Addleman, 107 Wash.2d at 506 , 730 P.2d 1327 ; Forster, 99 Wash.App. at 180 , 991 P.2d at 695 ; Randle, 47 Wash.App. at 240 , 734 P.2d 51 ; see also Calder, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) at 390-92 . [14] Collins, 497 U.S. at 41 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 ("constitutional prohibition on ex post facto laws app…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Schmidt
App. at 732 ; accord, Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916, 921 (1st Cir. 1942), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 (1943); United States v. Huss, 7 F.3d 1444 (9th Cir. 1993); Forster, 99 Wn.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr.
(2×)
Id.; see Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916, 922 (1st Cir.1942) (susceptibility of firearm to military application not determinative), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 1431 , 87 L.Ed. 1718 (1943).
discussed
Cited "see"
Quilici v. Village of Morton Grove
See Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916 (1st Cir. 1942), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 1431 , 87 L.Ed. 1718 (1943); Eckert v. City of Philadelphia, 329 F.Supp. 845 (E.D.Pa. *1183 1971), aff’d, 477 F.2d 610 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 843 , 94 S.Ct. 104 , 38 L.Ed.2d 81 (1973); In re Atkinson, 291 N.W.2d 396 (Minn.1980); State v. Amos, 343 So.2d 166 (La.1977); Commonwealth v. Davis, 369 Mass. 886 , 343 N.E.2d 847 (1976); State v. Sanne, 116 N.H. 583 , 364 A.2d 630 (1976); Harris v. State, 83 Nev. 404 , 432 P.2d 929 (1967); State v. Swanton, 129 Ariz. 131 , 629 P.2d 98 (Ct.App.19…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Waterman Steamship Corp.
Accord, The Wildwood, 133 F.2d 765 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 771 , 63 S.Ct. 1436 , 87 L.Ed. 1719 (1943); The George J.
cited
Cited "see"
James Wade Braswell v. United States
See Cases v. United States, 1 Cir., 131 F.2d 916 , certiorari denied 319 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 1431 , 87 L.Ed. 1718 . 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cole
See United States v. Warin, 530 F.2d 103, 106 (6th Cir.)(“If the logical extension of the defendant’s argument for the holding of Miller was inconceivable in 1942, it is completely irrational in this time of nuclear weapons.”), ce rt. denied, 426 U.S. 948 , 96 S.Ct. 3168 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1185 (1976); see also Cases v. United States, 131 F.2d 916, 922 (1st Cir.1942), cert. denied, Velazquez v. U.S., 319 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 1431 , 87 L.Ed. 1718 (1943).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion
Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense." (Id., at p. 178.) The rule resulting from Miller is that "absent a showing that the possession of a certain weapon has 'some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia,' the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to possess the weapon." (United States v. Hale (8th Cir. 1992) 978 F.2d 1016, 1019 ; see also Cases v. United States (1st Cir. 1942) 131 F.2d 916, 922 , cert. den. 319 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No. (1998)
Certainly it is not within judicial notice that this weapon is any part of the ordinary military equipment or that its use could contribute to the common defense." ( Id ., at p. 178.) The rule resulting from Miller is that "absent a showing that the possession of a certain weapon has `some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia,' the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to possess the weapon." ( United States v. Hale (8th Cir. 1992) 978 F.2d 1016 , 1019 ; see also Cases v. United States (1st Cir. 1942) 131 F.2d 916 , 922 , cert. den . 319…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Whisper Soft Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Pacific Northwest District Council, International Ladies Garment Workers Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenors. National Labor Relations Board v. Whisper Soft Mills, Inc., Pacific Northwest District Council, International Ladies Garment Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., Esmond Mills v. Commissioner, 132 F.2d 753, 755 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 1432 , 87 L.Ed. 1718 (1943); Restatement (Second) of Agency Sec. 12 (1958).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Whisper Soft Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., Esmond Mills v. Commissioner, 132 F.2d 753, 755 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 319 U.S. 770 , 63 S.Ct. 1432 , 87 L.Ed. 1718 (1943); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 12 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John M. Whelan & Sons, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 983.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1943.
Mr. George E. Beechwood for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Valentine Brookes and Hubert H. Margolies for the United States.
Cited by 31 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Washington Supreme Court (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.