green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“the jury may not be permitted to conjecture merely, or to conclude upon pure speculation or from passion, prejudice or sympathy”
Treatment trajectory · 1947 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1947
1986
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Melillo
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the jury may not be permitted to conjecture merely, or to conclude upon pure speculation or from passion, prejudice or sympathy
cited
Cited "see"
Craig v. United States
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389, 392-93 , 160 F.2d 229, 232-33 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Roscoe Slade, A/K/A \Slave\"
See Curley v. United States, 160 F.2d 229, 232 (D.C.Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947) (judge to determine whether "a reasonable mind might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt") 22 As appellants Watson and Marshall point out in their reply brief, even assuming that this ruling shows the trial judge did make a preliminary determination of admissibility, it remains possible that he himself considered "all the evidence," including co-conspirator statements, in finding that defendants had been shown to be conspirators.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Slade
See Curley v. United States, 160 F.2d 229, 232 (D.C.Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947) (judge to determine whether “a reasonable mind might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene F. House, in No. 74-1450. Appeal of Evelyn M. House in No. 74-1451
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229 (D.C.Cir.1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947); 2 C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwight L. Chapin
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229, 232 (1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. Jones
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229, 232-33 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed.2d 1850 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenhan v. United States
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles L. Wall and Howard L. Lund v. United States
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S. App.D.C. 389, 160 F.2d 229, 233 , cert. denied 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 . 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Earl R. Cephus v. United States
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 , rehearing denied, 331 U.S. 869 , 870, 67 S.Ct. 1729 , 91 L.Ed. 1872 (1947). .
cited
Cited "see"
Konvalinka v. United States
See Curley v.. United States, 81 U.S. App.D.C. 389, 160 F.2d 229 , certiorari denied 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Roberts, Jr. v. United States
(2×)
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229 (D.C.Cir.), certiorari denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947). .
cited
Cited "see"
Grover Lee Isaac v. United States
See Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229 (D.C.Cir.1947), certiorari denied 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Isaiah Bradley v. United States
See Curley v. United States, 1947, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229 , certiorari denied, 1947, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Han
Rule 29 does not, however, permit the district court to “substitute its own determination of the credibility of witnesses, the weight of the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn for that of the jury.” United States v. Mariani, 725 F.2d 862, 865 (2d Cir.1984); see also United States v. Guadagna, 183 F.3d 122, at 128-29 (2d Cir.1999) (“[I]f the court ‘concludes that either of the two results, a reasonable doubt or no reasonable doubt, is fairly possible, [the court] must let the jury decide the matter.’ ”) (quoting Curley v. United States, 160 F.2d 229, 233 (D.C.Cir.), …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twin City Fire Insurance v. Philadelphia Life Insurance
See also Taylor-Edwards Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 715 F.2d 1330, 1336 (9th Cir.1983) (citing the common law rule stated in Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co., 158 F.2d 490, 493 (9th Cir.1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 832 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1846 (1947) that extreme hardship is not sufficient to excuse non-performance on the ground of impossibility, but noting a trend in “[m]ore modern cases” to allow the defense where performance would be extremely costly or onerous although not literally impossible). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-Party
See also Taylor-Edwards Warehouse & Transfer Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 715 F.2d 1330, 1336 (9th Cir.1983) (citing the common law rule stated in Kiyoichi Fujikawa v. Sunrise Soda Water Works Co., 158 F.2d 490, 493 (9th Cir.1946), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 832 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1846 (1947) that extreme hardship is not sufficient to excuse non-performance on the ground of impossibility, but noting a trend in "[m]ore modern cases" to allow the defense where performance would be extremely costly or onerous although not literally impossible). 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wheeler v. United States
D.C. 156, 158, 375 F.2d 332, 334 (1967) (emphasis in original); see also Curley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389, 392-93 , 160 F.2d 229, 232-33 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James Cooper v. United States of America, Percy Taylor v. United States of America, Frederick Childs v. United States
(2×)
United States v. Garguilo, 310 F.2d 249, 254 (2d Cir. 1962); see also Gurley v. United States, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 389 , 160 F.2d 229 , cert. denied, 331 U.S. 837 , 67 S.Ct. 1511 , 91 L.Ed. 1850 (1947). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Helfend
v.
Fleming, Temporary Controls Administrator
v.
Fleming, Temporary Controls Administrator
No. 1234.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1947.
Hiram T. Kellogg for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Washington, Edwin D. Dupree, Jr., Charles P. Liff and Philip Travis for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
Creedon, Housing Expediter, substituted as the party respondent. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Emergency Court of Appeals denied.