green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jefferson Disposal Co. v. Parish of Jefferson, La.
See Fisch v. General Motors Corp., 169 F.2d 266, 270-72 (6th Cir.1948), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 902 , 69 S.Ct. 405 , 93 L.Ed. 436 (1949); Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 168 F.2d 58, 62-64 (4th Cir.1948). 31 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kahn v. Wall
See Fisch v. General Motors Corporation, 6 Cir., 169 F.2d 266 , certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 902 , 69 S.Ct. 405 , Battaglia v. General Motors Corporation, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 254 , certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 887 , 69 S.Ct. 236 ; and Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 58 , upholding the constitutionality of the Portal-to-Portal Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Propper, Receiver
v.
Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
v.
Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
No. 390.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 3, 1949.
A. Walter Socolow for petitioner., Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Bazelon and James L. Morrisson for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition for the writ, i. e.: (1) Did petitioner’s appointment as temporary statutory receiver, on June 12, 1941, endow him with title by operation of law to the debt in question which was good as against the Custodian’s subsequent Vesting Order? and (2) If not, did the September 29,1941, judgment appointing petitioner permanent statutory receiver endow him with title to the debt in question as of the date of his appointment as temporary statutory receiver which was good as against the subsequent Vesting Order?
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.