green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
“the primary duty to so classify and report as to the nature and amount of disbursements rested on defendant.”
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States
the primary duty to so classify and report as to the nature and amount of disbursements rested on defendant.
cited
Cited "see"
John S. Clark Co., Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Ill.
See Updike v. West, 172 F.2d 663, 665 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1050 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949); see also Burns v. W.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
See Loughran v. Warden, 192 Md. 719, 723-725 , 64 A. 2d 712 , certiorari denied 337 U. S. 908 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Medlin, B.A. McFarland and B.E. McFarland
Accord Updike v. West, 172 F.2d 663, 666 (10th Cir.1949), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1050 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 ; Fed.R.Civ.P. 67; 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041 , 2042.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States
See Sioux Tribe v. United States, 105 Ct.Cl. 725 , 794, 64 F.Supp. 312, 327 (1946), vacated and remanded, 329 U.S. 685 (1946) aff'd on reh’g, 112 Ct.Cl. 50 , 78 F.Supp. 793 (1948), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1045 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendrano v. Smith
See also, De War v. Hunter, 170 F.2d 993, 997 (10th Cir.1948), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1048 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 , reh. denied, 337 U.S. 934 , 69 S.Ct. 1493 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949) ("[W]hat constitutes due process in a trial by a military tribunal is gauged by the principles of military law enacted by the Congress, provided the accused is given due notice of the charge against him, a fair opportunity to prepare his defense, and his guilt is adjudicated by a competent tribunal") (footnote omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendrano v. Smith
See also, De War v. Hunter, 170 F.2d 993, 997 (10th Cir.1948), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 , 69 S.Ct. 1048 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 , reh. denied, 337 U.S. 934 , 69 S.Ct. 1493 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949) (“[W]hat constitutes due process in a trial by a military tribunal is gauged by the principles of military law enacted by the Congress, provided the accused is given due notice of the charge against him, a fair opportunity to prepare his defense, and his guilt is adjudicated by a competent tribunal”) (footnote omitted).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United States
See also, Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States, 105 Ct. Cl. 725 , 802, 64 F. Supp. 312, 331 , cert. denied, 337 U.S. 908 (1949); Blackfeet & Gros Ventre Tribes, supra, 32 Ind. Cl.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sioux Tribe of Indians
v.
United States
v.
United States
Nos. 526 and 527.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1949.
Ralph H. Case and James S. Y. Ivins for petitioner., Solicitor Géneral Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech and John R. Benney for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Claims (1)
Certiorari denied.