green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.9 score
“he mistakes must be those of reasonable men, acting on facts leading sensibly to their conclusions of probability.”
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stanberry v. State
he mistakes must be those of reasonable men, acting on facts leading sensibly to their conclusions of probability.
cited
Cited "see"
Mascarenas v. State
See Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 , reh. denied, 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 31 , 94 L.Ed. 513 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jandro v. State
(2×)
See Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 , reh. denied, 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 31 , 94 L.Ed. 513 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. LeGrand
Probable cause requires information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense is being committed or that evidence of a crime may be found in a certain place (People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423 ; see, Brinegar v United States, 338 US 160, 175 , reh denied 338 US 839 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jean E. Welch v. State Department of Highways and Public Transportation and the State of Texas, Drott Manufacturing Company and J.I. Case Co.
See for example, Cosmospolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783 , 69 S.Ct. 1317 , 69 L.Ed. 1692 rehearing denied, 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 32 , 94 L.Ed. 513 (1949), overruling Hurst v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 328 U.S. 707 , 66 S.Ct. 1218 , 90 L.Ed. 1534 (1946); Caldarola v. Eckert, 332 U.S. 155 , 67 S.Ct. 1569 , 91 L.Ed. 1968 (1947) (cases dealing with seamen on government owned and operated ships under war shipping Administration Agents).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. MARINE CARRIERS CORPORATION
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783 , 69 S.Ct. 1317 , 93 L.Ed. 1692 (1949), rehearing denied, 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 32 , 94 L.Ed. 513 ; Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co., 317 U.S. 239 , 63 S.Ct. 246 , 87 L.Ed. 239 (1942); Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Smith, 305 U.S. 424 , 59 S.Ct. 262 , 83 L.Ed. 265 (1939); Cox v. Roth, 348 U.S. 207 , 75 S.Ct. 242 , 99 L.Ed. 260 (1954); The Arizona v. Anelich, 298 U.S. 110 , 56 S.Ct. 707 , 80 L.Ed. 1075 (1936), rehearing denied, 298 U.S. 692 , 56 S.Ct. 945 , 80 L.Ed. 1409 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koss v. Kroger Co., 07ap-450 (6-5-2008)
Evans v. Smith (1994), 97 Ohio App.3d 59 , 69 , citing *Page 10 McFinley v. Bethesda Oak Hosp. (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 613 , 617 , jurisdictional motion overruled, 65 Ohio St.3d 1436 , citing Huber v. O'Neill (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 28 , 30 . {¶ 27} "Probable cause to arrest a person for a misdemeanor exists when there are circumstances which would cause a reasonable person to believe that a crime had been committed in his presence." Harn , supra; see, also, Koss I , at ¶ 13, quoting Harn , supra. "Probable cause deals not with certainties, but with probabilities." State v. Williams (Nov. 21, 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wright
See United States v. Gant, 759 F.2d 484, 488 (5th Cir.) (holding that “the nexus between the place to be searched and the evidence sought may be established through normal inferences about the location of evidence.”), cert. de nied, 474 U.S. 851 , 106 S.Ct. 149 , 88 L.Ed.2d 123 (1985); see also United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1367 (2d Cir.) (holding that “[p]robable cause to believe certain items will be found in a specific location is a ‘practical, nontechnical conception,’ Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949), that need not be …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ward
(2×)
Edwardsen v. State, 243 Md. 131, 136 , 220 A.2d 547, 551 (1966); see also Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 , 1891, rehearing denied, 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 31 , 94 L.Ed. 513 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitola v. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
PLAINTIFF’S JONES ACT CLAIMS Under federal law, a “seaman” is entitled to sue his employer, and only the single entity determined to be his employer, for negligence pursuant to the Jones Act. 42 U.S.C.App. § 688; see also Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllister, 337 U.S. 783, 791 , 69 S.Ct. 1317, 1321-22 , 93 L.Ed. 1692 , reh’g denied, 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 32 , 94 *355 L.Ed. 513 (1949); Fitzgerald v. A.L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Crotty
“In determining probable cause to arrest, we are dealing only with reasonable probabilities and not the amount of evidence required to sustain a conviction or to make out a prima facie case.” State v. Birmingham, 122 N.H. 1169, 1172 , 453 A.2d 1329, 1331 (1982); see also Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 172-73 (probable cause to arrest does not require same amount of evidence as required to sustain conviction), reh’g denied, 338 U.S. 839 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Murphy
See also Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. *553 160, 188, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1317 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 , 1897 (Jackson, J., dissenting) reh. den. 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 31 , 94 L.Ed. 513 (1949) (officials may stop car without probable cause for regulation of traffic, identification where proper and in many other circumstances that do not imply an arrest or charge of crime).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Bigelow
Probable cause does not require proof sufficient to warrant a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt but merely information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been or is being committed or that evidence of a crime may be found in a certain place (People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 602 , supra; see also, Brinegar v United States, 338 US 160, 175 , reh denied 338 US 839 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Anderson
See also Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 188 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1317 , 93 L.Ed. [1879] (Jackson, J., dissenting) reh. den. 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 31 , 94 L.Ed. 513 (1949) (officials may stop car without probable cause for regulation of traffic, identification where proper and in many other circumstances that do not imply an arrest or charge of crime).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gervasio
(2×)
See also Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 188 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1317 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 , 1897 (Jackson, J., dissenting) reh. den. 338 U.S. 839 , 70 S.Ct. 31 , 94 L.Ed. 513 (1949) (officials may stop car without probable cause for regulation of traffic, identification where proper and in many other circumstances that do not imply an arrest or charge of crime).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brinegar
v.
United States Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McComb, Wage & Hour Administrator McComb, Wage & Hour Administrator v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., Inc. v. McAllister Kohl v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co., Inc. Ajax Trucking Co., Inc. v. Browne, constituting the State Tax Commission of New York Fujino v. Clark, Attorney General Tibbals v. Mica Mountain Mines, Inc. Zimmermann v. United States Latta v. Western Investment Co. Continental Casualty Co. v. United States for the use of Schaefer, doing business as the Concrete Construction Co. Whetstone v. United States Lyons v. Capital Transit Co. Keating v. United States
v.
United States Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McComb, Wage & Hour Administrator McComb, Wage & Hour Administrator v. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Stone, Chairman, State Tax Commission Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., Inc. v. McAllister Kohl v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co., Inc. Ajax Trucking Co., Inc. v. Browne, constituting the State Tax Commission of New York Fujino v. Clark, Attorney General Tibbals v. Mica Mountain Mines, Inc. Zimmermann v. United States Latta v. Western Investment Co. Continental Casualty Co. v. United States for the use of Schaefer, doing business as the Concrete Construction Co. Whetstone v. United States Lyons v. Capital Transit Co. Keating v. United States
No. 12; No. 128; No. 196; No. 287; No. 351; No. 509; No. 522; No. 604; No. 659; No. 740; No. 748; No. 788; No. 791; No. 826; No. 832; No. 877.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1949.
Applications, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)
[*839] 338 U. S. 160;
[*840] No. 748, No. 788, No. 791, No. 826, No. 832, No. 877,October Term, 1948.
October Term, 1948.
October Term, 1948.
October Term, 1948.
October Term, 1948.
October Term, 1948.
337 U. S. 942; and
337 U. S. 959. The petitions for rehearing in these cases are severally denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.