green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co. v. Erickson
See Person v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., 176 F.2d 237 (2 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 886 , 70 S.Ct. 189 , 94 L.Ed. 544 (1949); Blair v. Durham, 134 F.2d 729 (6 Cir. 1943); Fegles Construction Co. v. McLaughlin Construction Co., 205 F.2d 637 (9 Cir. 1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schultz & Lindsay Construction Company v. Erickson
See Person v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., 176 F.2d 237 (2 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 886 , 70 S.Ct. 189 , 94 L.Ed. 544 (1949); Blair v. Durham, 134 F.2d 729 (6 Cir. 1943); Fegles Construction Co. v. McLaughlin Construction Co., 205 F.2d 637 (9 Cir. 1953). 68 We have carefully examined the record in light of the contentions of appellants and the controlling law.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sugarman
v.
California
v.
California
No. 354.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 21, 1949.
Morris Lavine and Max Widens for petitioner. Fred N. Howser, Attorney General of California, and Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
District Court of Appeal, 3d Appellate District, of California. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.