green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
FEGELY v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC
Pa. 1983)6; see Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America, 194 F.2d 770, 771 (3d Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Wayzata Bank & Trust Company v. A & B Farms
See Westinghouse Electrical Corp. v. United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers, 194 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1060 , 96 L.Ed. 1362 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Wayzata Bank & Trust Co. v. A & B Farms
See Westinghouse Electrical Corp. v. United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers, 194 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1060 , 96 L.Ed. 1362 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
James Hamilton, as Administrator of the Estate of Gordon Daniel Hamilton, Deceased v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.
See Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America, 194 F.2d 770 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1060 , 96 L.Ed. 1362 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 77-1078
Accord, United States v. One 1949 Pontiac Sedan, 194 F.2d 756, 758-59 (7th Cir.), Cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1061 , 96 L.Ed. 1363 (1952); United States v. Davidson, 50 F.2d 517, 520-21 (1st Cir.), Cert. denied, 284 U.S. 660 , 52 S.Ct. 36 , 76 L.Ed. 559 (1931). 22 While we cannot agree with the government's insistance that probable cause is all that is needed by way of proof to justify a forfeiture even in the face of overwhelming proof that the cause, though probable, was not ultimately sustained, it is apparent to us that a showing of probable cause is sufficient to warrant a forfe…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1975 Mercedes 280S
Accord, United States v. One 1949 Pontiac Sedan, 194 F.2d 756, 758-59 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1061 , 96 L.Ed. 1363 (1952); United States v. Davidson, 50 F.2d 517, 520-21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 284 U.S. 660 , 52 S.Ct. 36 , 76 L.Ed. 559 (1931).
cited
Cited "see"
Steinhauser v. Hertz Corporation
See Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp., 194 F.2d 515 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1061 , 96 L.Ed. 1363 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Steinhauser v. Hertz Corp.
See Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp., 194 F.2d 515 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1061 , 96 L.Ed. 1363 (1952).
examined
Cited "see"
Joseph Walters v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.
(4×)
See Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp., 194 F.2d 515 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1061 (1952). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Quintin, Libelant-Appellant v. Sprague Steamship Company
(2×)
See Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp., 2 Cir., 194 F.2d 515 , certiorari denied Overseas Tankship Corp. v. Keen, 343 U.S. 966 , 72 S.Ct. 1061 , 96 L.Ed. 1363 ; and Boudoin v. Lykes Bros.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martelly v. State
See also Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp., 194 F. 2d 515 (2 Cir. 1952), cert. den. 343 U. S. 966 , 72 S. Ct. 1061 ; Green v. Reading Co., 183 F. 2d 716 (3 Cir. 1950).
United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America
v.
Westinghouse Electric Corp.
v.
Westinghouse Electric Corp.
No. 719.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1952.
Arthur Kinoy and Frank J. Donner for petitioners. John C. Bane, Jr. for the Westinghouse Electric Corporation, and Benjamin C. Sigal for the International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers (CIO) et al., respondents.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.