Bridges v. United States, 345 U.S. 904 (1953). · Go Syfert
Search
Bridges v. United States, 345 U.S. 904 (1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Donnelly v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency (cadc, 1959-06-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Donnelly v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency
D.C. Cir. · 1959 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Williams v. Virginia Military Institute, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 206, 208 , 198 F.2d 980, 982 , certiorari denied 1953, 345 U.S. 904 , 73 S.Ct. 640 , 97 L.
Bridges
v.
United States
No. 548.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 9, 1953.
345 U.S. 904
Telford Taylor and Norman Leonard for petitioners., Solicitor General Cummings, John F. Davis, Beatrice Rosenberg, Carl H. Imlay and John R: Wilkins filed a memorandum for the United States.
Applications, Consideration, Took.
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition for the writ, vis.:

“(1) Whether, in view of prior adjudications (including the determination of this Court in Bridges v. Wixon, 326 U. S. 135), this proceeding is barred, in whole or in part, by the principles of res judicata, or estoppel, or the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
“(2) Whether this proceeding is barred by the statute of limitations.”

Motions for leave to file briefs of International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union and Local 8, International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union, and others, as amici curiae, are denied.

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.