Wisconsin v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 345 U.S. 934 (1953). · Go Syfert
Wisconsin v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 345 U.S. 934 (1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City Of Oakland, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (ca9, 1985-03-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" City Of Oakland, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 199 F.2d 206 (9th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 794 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 (1953) (related case); see also Alexander v. FERC, 609 F.2d 543, 550 (D.C.Cir.1979) (transactions which were metered and billed individually distinguished from others not deemed to be "resales"). 9 Yet FERC contends that the Port Department is most aptly characterized as a landlord that redistributes electricity to a few select tenants--a status it claims is inconsistent with being a reseller.
discussed Cited "see" City of Oakland v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 199 F.2d 206 (9th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 794 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 (1953) (related case); see also Alexander v. FERC, 609 F.2d 543, 550 (D.C.Cir. 1979) (transactions which were metered and billed individually distinguished from others not deemed to be “resales”).
discussed Cited "see" Svilar Light & Power v. RIVERTON VALLEY ELEC. ASS'N
Wyo. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See the case of State of Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 307 , 201 F.2d 183, 186 , certiorari denied 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 795 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 , where the Court said: "We think the Company's arguments quite untenable.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wisconsin
v.
Federal Power Commission and Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 574; No. 575.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 13, 1953.
345 U.S. 934
Vernon W. Thomson, Attorney General, and Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Wisconsin, and William E. Torkelson for the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, petitioners in No. 574., William Ryan for petitioner in No. 575., Acting Solicitor General Stern filed a memorandum for respondent.
Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.