green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
City Of Oakland, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 199 F.2d 206 (9th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 794 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 (1953) (related case); see also Alexander v. FERC, 609 F.2d 543, 550 (D.C.Cir.1979) (transactions which were metered and billed individually distinguished from others not deemed to be "resales"). 9 Yet FERC contends that the Port Department is most aptly characterized as a landlord that redistributes electricity to a few select tenants--a status it claims is inconsistent with being a reseller.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Oakland v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 199 F.2d 206 (9th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 794 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 (1953) (related case); see also Alexander v. FERC, 609 F.2d 543, 550 (D.C.Cir. 1979) (transactions which were metered and billed individually distinguished from others not deemed to be “resales”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Svilar Light & Power v. RIVERTON VALLEY ELEC. ASS'N
See the case of State of Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 307 , 201 F.2d 183, 186 , certiorari denied 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 795 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 , where the Court said: "We think the Company's arguments quite untenable.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wisconsin
v.
Federal Power Commission and Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission and Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 574; No. 575.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 13, 1953.
Vernon W. Thomson, Attorney General, and Stewart G. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of Wisconsin, and William E. Torkelson for the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, petitioners in No. 574., William Ryan for petitioner in No. 575., Acting Solicitor General Stern filed a memorandum for respondent.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.