green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 7×
13.1 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 5 distinct cases, last quoted 2010 ·
…in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bogacz v. MTD Products, Inc.
in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Estate of Creek v. Mittal Steel USA, Inc.
in 505 considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Shontz v. RITE AID OF PENNSYLVANIA INC.
in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Seifert v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tice v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zeno v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.
n considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Menta v. Community College of Beaver County
in considering a motion for summary judgment, the court is entitled to consider exhibits and other papers that have been identified by affidavit or otherwise made admissible in evidence
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jahn v. Regan
See e.g., Pollack v. City of Newark, 147 F.Supp. 35, 39 (D.N.J.1956), aff'd, 248 F.2d 543 (3rd Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 964 , 78 S.Ct. 554 , 2 L.Ed.2d 539 (1958); C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stewart
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 362.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1958.
355 U.S. 964
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (7)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.