green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
The Tonkawa Tribe v. Richards
See Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority of New York, 257 F.2d 885, 893 (2d Cir.1958) (Nonintercourse Act applied to condemnation proceeding by state), vacated as moot, 362 U.S. 608 , 80 S.Ct. 960 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1960); United States v. First Nat'l.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Richards
See Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority of New York, 257 F.2d 885, 893 (2d Cir.1958) (Nonintercourse Act applied to condemnation proceeding by state), vacated as moot, 362 U.S. 608 , 80 S.Ct. 960 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1960); United States v. First Nat’l Bank, 56 F.2d 634, 635 (D.Neb.1931) (“The Omaha tribe owned its lands before Nebraska became a state_ It is hot competent for either the Congress by legislation or the states by court decisions to impair those rights.”), aff'd, 59 F.2d 367 (8th Cir.1932). d.
discussed
Cited "see"
That opinion, Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Richards, 67 F.3d 103 (5th Cir.1995) is vacated and the following opinion is substituted in its place
See Tuscarora Nation of Indians v. Power Authority of New York, 257 F.2d 885, 893 (2d Cir.1958) (Nonintercourse Act applied to condemnation proceeding by state), vacated as moot, 362 U.S. 608 , 80 S.Ct. 960 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1009 (1960); United States v. First Nat'l Bank, 56 F.2d 634, 635 (D.Neb.1931) (“The Omaha tribe owned its lands before Nebraska became a state____ It is not competent for either the Congress by legislation or the states by court decisions to impair those rights.”), aff'd, 59 F.2d 367 (8th Cir.1932). d.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McMORRAN, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF NEW YORK,
v.
TUSCARORA NATION OF INDIANS, ALSO KNOWN AS TUSCARORA INDIAN NATION.
v.
TUSCARORA NATION OF INDIANS, ALSO KNOWN AS TUSCARORA INDIAN NATION.
4.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1960.
362 U.S. 608
Per Curiam.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sackman for appellant.
Arthur Lazarus, Jr. and Eugene Gressman for appellee.
Thomas F. Moore, Jr. for the Power Authority of the State of New York, as amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
Upon the suggestion of mootness, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the complaint as moot.