green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
McIlvaine v. United States
But see Rosengarten v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 287 , 292, 181 F.Supp. 275, 278 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 (1960); Jones v. United States, 226 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1955). 3 In any event, in the present case, plaintiffs have presented no evidence of proper preparation, addressing or mailing of their 1981 tax return.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dresser Industries, Inc. v. United States
See Rosengarten v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 287 , 181 F.Supp. 275, 279 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 (1960) (informal claim that only “makes it possible for the Commissioner to discover the existence of a claim if he makes an independent investigation and sorts out the clues will not do.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Facilities Systems Engineering Corp. v. United States
Plaintiff cannot rely on the mere fact of mailing the June 20, 1990, letter to establish that it was received by the CO. “[A] letter which is properly sealed, stamped, addressed, and deposited in the United States Mails is presumed to reach the addressee and be received by him in due course of the mails.” Charlson Realty Co. v. United States, 181 Ct.Cl. 262, 274 , 384 F.2d 434, 442 (1967); accord Rosengarten v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 287, 291 , 181 F.Supp. 275, 277 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Commercial National Bank of Peoria, as of the Estate of Joseph G. O'Brien
See Rosengarten v. United States, 181 F.Supp. 275, 279 , 149 Ct.Cl. 287 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 (1960); see also American Radiator, 318 F.2d at 920 (discussing informal refund claims generally and not confronted with this particular issue); Brigham v. United States, 470 F.2d 571, 579 (Ct.Cl.1972) (quoting American Radiator and also not faced with this issue), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 831 , 94 S.Ct. 62 , 38 L.Ed.2d 65 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hassett v. Revlon, Inc. (In Re O. P. M. Leasing Services, Inc.)
(2×)
See Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co., 277 F.2d 46, 49 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 538 (1960) where the Second Circuit expressed the rule as: When two parties have made a contract and have expressed it in a writing to which they have both assented as the complete and accurate interpretation of that contract, evidence, whether parol or otherwise of antecedent understandings and negotiations will not be admitted for the purpose of varying or contradicting the writing.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Feodor Fedorenko, Etc.
See Ganduxe y Marino v. Murff, 1959, S.D.N.Y., 183 F.Supp. 565, 567 , aff’d, 2 Cir. 1960, 278 F.2d *952 330, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 . 5 As Mr. Justice Black has written, “[n]ot only is United States citizenship a ‘high privilege’, it is a priceless treasure”.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ralls v. Manson
See United States v. Curcio, 279 F.2d 681 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 59 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960); United States v. Thomas, 282 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1960); United States v. Tolub, 309 F.2d 286 (2d Cir. 1962); United States v. Kahaner, 317 F.2d 459, 483-484 (2d Cir.), cert. denied Corallo v. United States, 375 U.S. 835 , 84 S.Ct. 62 , 11 L.Ed.2d 65 (1963); United States v. Kenner, supra, 354 F.2d at 782-783 ; United States v. Bilotti, 380 F.2d 649, 654 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 389 U.S. 944 , 88 S.Ct. 308 , 19 L.Ed.2d 300 (1967); United States v. Meyers, 410 F.2d 693, 697 (2d Cir.), …
discussed
Cited "see"
The Chase Manhattan Bank, a National Banking Association v. The First Marion Bank, a Banking Corporation
(2×)
Eskimo Pie Corp. v. Whitelawn Dairies, Inc., S.D.N.Y.1968, 284 F.Supp. 987, 993-995 ; see Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co., 2 Cir. 1960, 277 F.2d 46, 49 , cert. denied, 1960, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 ; Dixon Iramaos & Cia.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charlson Realty Company v. The United States
(2×)
See Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, and Rosengarten v. United States, infra. 38 The problem before us was again considered by this court in an opinion also written by Chief Judge Jones in the case of Rosengarten v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 275 , 149 Ct.Cl. 287 (1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed. 2d 53 , where the court held that the petition was not timely filed.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1964
(2×)
See, generally, Annotation, 28 A.L.R.2d 929 (1953) 2 See Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company (2 Cir. 1960) 277 F.2d 46 , cert. denied (1960) 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Langendorf United Bakeries, Inc. v. Moore
(2×)
See Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company (2 Cir. 1960) 277 F.2d 46 , cert. denied (1960) 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.
(2×)
Compare Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co., 277 F.2d 46, 50-51 , (2d Cir.1960), ce rt. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 (1960); cf. Nat Nal Service Stations, Inc. v. Wolf, 304 N.Y. 332, 337 , 107 N.E.2d 473, 476 (1952) (by its terms, the contract alleged could conceivably have been performed within one year).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kredietbank, N v. v. ESIC Capital Corp. (In Re Rosner)
See also De Korwin v. First National Bank of Chicago, 170 F.Supp. 112, 128 (N.D.Ill.1958), aff'd, 275 F.2d 755 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 61 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 (1960) (interpreting New York law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,011 United States of America v. Robert D. Alexander, Sr.
(2×)
See also Barnhill v. United States, 279 F.2d 105, 106 (5th Cir.1960) (“In other words, [defendant] cling[s] to probation while seeking to welch on its price.”), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 60 , 5 L.Ed.2d 53 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anne Lamont
See e. g., United States v. Reed, 526 F.2d 740, 743 (CA 2 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 956 , 96 S.Ct. 1431 , 47 L.Ed.2d 361 (1976), and United States v. Curcio, 279 F.2d 681, 682 (CA 2), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 824 , 81 S.Ct. 59 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960).
Doggett
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 218.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1960.
Daniel R. Dixon for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and I. Henry Kutz for respondent.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.