Dinkins v. Rogers, 366 U.S. 913 (1961). · Go Syfert
Dinkins v. Rogers, 366 U.S. 913 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he state court action in issuing its injunction ... was in violation of the basic legal principle that state courts are without jurisdiction to review the discretion or enjoin the acts of federal officers.”
16 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clark Const. Co., Inc. v. Pena (almd, 1996-04-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Clark Const. Co., Inc. v. Pena
M.D. Ala. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he state court action in issuing its injunction ... was in violation of the basic legal principle that state courts are without jurisdiction to review the discretion or enjoin the acts of federal officers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thomas
La. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Ferguson, 240 La. 593 , 124 So.2d 558, 567-68 (1960) (on rehearing), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 1089 , 6 L.Ed.2d 237 (1961); State v. Thomas, 161 La. 1010 , 109 So. 819, 821 (1926); cf. In re Giangrosso, 395 So.2d 709, 712 (La.1981), State v. Lewis, 250 La. 876 , 199 So.2d 907, 910-11 (1967); State v. Carter, 206 La. 181 , 19 So.2d 41, 43-45 (1944).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dinkins
v.
Rogers, Attorney General and Alabama ex rel. Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama v. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States
No. 823; No. 824.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 1, 1961.
366 U.S. 913
MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, Willard W. Livingston, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Leslie Hall and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall and Harold H. Greene for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: M.D. Alabama (1)

Motions to substitute Robert F. Kennedy in the place of William P. Rogers as party respondent granted. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.