green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Birnbaum v. Trussell
See Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness, 373 U.S. 96 , 104—105, 83 S.Ct. 1175 , 10 L.Ed.2d 224 (1963), motion for clarification denied 375 U.S. 950 , 84 S.Ct. 439 , 11 L.Ed. 312 (1963); Morgan v. United States, 304 U.S. 1, 18-19 , 58 S.Ct. 773, 776 , 82 L.Ed. 1129 (1938) (“The right to a hearing embraces * * * a reasonable opportunity to know the claims of the opposing party * * * Those who are brought into contest with the Government in a quasi-judicial proceeding aimed at the control of their activities are entitled to be fairly advised of what the Government proposes * * * ”);…
discussed
Cited "see"
9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1140, 1 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9759 Morton Birnbaum v. Ray E. Trussell, Commissioner of the Department of Hospitals of the City of New York, Robert J. Mangum, First Deputy Commissioner of the Department of Hospitals of the City of New York, and William Lewis, President, Local 237, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See Willner v. Committee on Character & Fitness, 373 U.S. 96, 104-105 , 83 S.Ct. 1175 , 10 L.Ed.2d 224 (1963), motion for clarification denied 375 U.S. 950 , 84 S.Ct. 439 , 11 L.Ed. 312 (1963); Morgan v. United States, 304 U.S. 1, 18-19 , 58 S.Ct. 773, 776 , 82 L.Ed. 1129 (1938) ('The right to a hearing embraces * * * a reasonable opportunity to know the claims of the opposing party * * * Those who are brought into contest with the Governmetn in a quasijudicial proceeding aimed at the control of their activities are entitled to be fairly advised of what the Government proposes * * *'); Hornsby…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whitney v. Board of Regents of University of Wis.
Clair, 293 F.Supp. 337, 341 (E.D.N.Y.1968); see also Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, 373 U.S. 96, 104-105 , 83 S.Ct. 1175 , 10 L.Ed.2d 224 (1963), motion for clarification denied 375 U.S. 950 , 84 S.Ct. 439 , 11 L.Ed.2d 312 (1963); Morgan v. United States, 304 U.S. 1, 18-19 , 58 S.Ct. 773 , 82 L.Ed. 1129 (1938).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Willner
v.
Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department
v.
Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department
No. 140.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1963.
Henry Waldman on the motion.
Published
373 U. S. 96. The motion for clarification or amendment of the mandate is denied.