Arnebergh v. Zeitlin, 375 U.S. 957 (1963). · Go Syfert
Arnebergh v. Zeitlin, 375 U.S. 957 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
143 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 37 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Carmel v. Thomas (nysd, 1981-03-23) · Strongest negative: Darwin C. Bailey v. Mason F. Holley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana (ca7, 1976-02-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Darwin C. Bailey v. Mason F. Holley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana
7th Cir. · 1976 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254, 318 F.2d 225 (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963), which held other sections of the Administrative Procedure Act inapplicable to parole proceedings. 13 .
discussed Cited "but see" United States Ex Rel. Harrison v. Pace
E.D. Pa. · 1974 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
An appeal of that decision is currently under advisement by the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia after appellate argument held on March 11, 1974; see also Hurley v. Reed, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 32 , 288 F.2d 844, 845-846 (1961) ; but cf. Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (en banc), cert. denied 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 447 , 11 L.Ed.2d 316 (1963) ; Hiatt v. Compagna, 178 F.2d 42, 46 (5th Cir.), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 340 U.S. 880 , 71 S.Ct. 192 , 95 L.Ed. 639 (1950) ; see also Washington v. Hagan, 287 F.2d 332, 334 (3d Cir. 1960). 3 .
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Carmel v. Thomas
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
congress has granted the power to revoke a conditional release upon determining that a condition of the parole has been violated
discussed Cited "see" Altimus v. Manhood Foundation, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963); Hiatt v. Campagna, 178 F.2d 42, 44-45 (5th Cir. 1949) (dictum), aff’d by equally divided court, 340 U.S. 880 , 71 S.Ct. 192 , 95 L.Ed. 639 (1950).
cited Cited "see" Hoffa v. Saxbe
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225, 234 (1963) (en lane), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 315 . 58 .
cited Cited "see" Keuper v. Wilson
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2d 901 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 800 , 383 P. 2d 152 (Sup. Ct. Cal. 1963), cert. den. 375 U. S. 957 , 84 S. Ct. 445 , 11 L.
cited Cited "see" Keuper v. Wilson
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2 d 901, 31 Cal. Rptr. 800 , 383 P. 2 d 152 (Sup. Ct. Cal. 1963), cert. den. 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 445 , 11 L.Ed. 2 d 315.
discussed Cited "see" Fiske v. England
D.C. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254, 267 , 318 F.2d 225, 238 , cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963); De Bernardo v. Rogers, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 254 F.2d 81 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 816 , 79 S.Ct. 24 , 3 L.Ed.2d 58 (1958). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hughes Anderson Bagley v. J.J. Harvey, U.S. Marshal, and Audrey Kaslow, U.S. Parole Commission
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hyser v. Reed, 318 F.2d 225, 239 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gaffey v. Babb (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal 2d 901, 31 Cal Rptr 800, 383 P2d 152 , 10 ALR3d 707, cert den 375 US 957 (1963).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gaddy v. Michael
4th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Bearden v. State of South Carolina, et al. (4th Cir. 1971) 443 F.2d 1090 , 1095 § 4207, 18 U.S.C. expressly provides that the parolee shall be given a hearing after he is "retaken upon a warrant." On principles of fundamental fairness, this hearing was required to be two-tiered under the basic decision of Mr. Chief Justice (then Circuit Judge) Burger in Hyser v. Reed (1963) 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225, 245 , cert. denied 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 , as subsequently incorporated in the Board's regulations. § 2.40, 28 C.F.R.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." John J. Morrissey v. Lou v. Brewer, Warden, G. Donald Booher v. Lee and O'Brien Counties and the State of Iowa
8th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Richardson v. Markley, 339 F.2d 967, 969 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 851 , 86 S.Ct. 100 , 15 L.Ed.2d 90 (1965) and Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App. 254, 318 F.2d 225 , 238, cert. denied sub nom Thompson v. United States Board of Parole, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963), both holding that parole revocation is not a part of the criminal process.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arnebergh
v.
Zeitlin
No. 584.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1963.
375 U.S. 957
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for petitioner. Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 85%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

Motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, in support of the petition, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.