green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Darwin C. Bailey v. Mason F. Holley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana
But see Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254, 318 F.2d 225 (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963), which held other sections of the Administrative Procedure Act inapplicable to parole proceedings. 13 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States Ex Rel. Harrison v. Pace
An appeal of that decision is currently under advisement by the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia after appellate argument held on March 11, 1974; see also Hurley v. Reed, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 32 , 288 F.2d 844, 845-846 (1961) ; but cf. Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (en banc), cert. denied 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 447 , 11 L.Ed.2d 316 (1963) ; Hiatt v. Compagna, 178 F.2d 42, 46 (5th Cir.), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 340 U.S. 880 , 71 S.Ct. 192 , 95 L.Ed. 639 (1950) ; see also Washington v. Hagan, 287 F.2d 332, 334 (3d Cir. 1960). 3 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carmel v. Thomas
congress has granted the power to revoke a conditional release upon determining that a condition of the parole has been violated
discussed
Cited "see"
Altimus v. Manhood Foundation, Inc.
See Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963); Hiatt v. Campagna, 178 F.2d 42, 44-45 (5th Cir. 1949) (dictum), aff’d by equally divided court, 340 U.S. 880 , 71 S.Ct. 192 , 95 L.Ed. 639 (1950).
cited
Cited "see"
Hoffa v. Saxbe
See Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225, 234 (1963) (en lane), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 315 . 58 .
cited
Cited "see"
Keuper v. Wilson
See Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2d 901 , 31 Cal. Rptr. 800 , 383 P. 2d 152 (Sup. Ct. Cal. 1963), cert. den. 375 U. S. 957 , 84 S. Ct. 445 , 11 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Keuper v. Wilson
See Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2 d 901, 31 Cal. Rptr. 800 , 383 P. 2 d 152 (Sup. Ct. Cal. 1963), cert. den. 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 445 , 11 L.Ed. 2 d 315.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fiske v. England
See generally Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254, 267 , 318 F.2d 225, 238 , cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963); De Bernardo v. Rogers, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 254 F.2d 81 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 816 , 79 S.Ct. 24 , 3 L.Ed.2d 58 (1958). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes Anderson Bagley v. J.J. Harvey, U.S. Marshal, and Audrey Kaslow, U.S. Parole Commission
See also Hyser v. Reed, 318 F.2d 225, 239 (D.C.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaffey v. Babb
(2×)
See, e.g., Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal 2d 901, 31 Cal Rptr 800, 383 P2d 152 , 10 ALR3d 707, cert den 375 US 957 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaddy v. Michael
See also, Bearden v. State of South Carolina, et al. (4th Cir. 1971) 443 F.2d 1090 , 1095 § 4207, 18 U.S.C. expressly provides that the parolee shall be given a hearing after he is "retaken upon a warrant." On principles of fundamental fairness, this hearing was required to be two-tiered under the basic decision of Mr. Chief Justice (then Circuit Judge) Burger in Hyser v. Reed (1963) 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225, 245 , cert. denied 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 , as subsequently incorporated in the Board's regulations. § 2.40, 28 C.F.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John J. Morrissey v. Lou v. Brewer, Warden, G. Donald Booher v. Lee and O'Brien Counties and the State of Iowa
See also Richardson v. Markley, 339 F.2d 967, 969 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 851 , 86 S.Ct. 100 , 15 L.Ed.2d 90 (1965) and Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App. 254, 318 F.2d 225 , 238, cert. denied sub nom Thompson v. United States Board of Parole, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963), both holding that parole revocation is not a part of the criminal process.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arnebergh
v.
Zeitlin
v.
Zeitlin
No. 584.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1963.
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for petitioner. Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, in support of the petition, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.