green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Graewe
Accord, Mastrian v. Hedman, 326 F.2d 708 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 (1964); Fernandez v. United States, 81 S.Ct. 642 , 5 L.Ed.2d 683 (1961) (Harlan, *57 Circuit J.); Carbo v. United States, 288 F.2d 282, 286 (9th Cir. 1961); United States v. Gilbert, 425 F.2d 490, 491 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Stansel v. Beard
See Mastrian v. Hedman, 326 F.2d 708 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 982 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin Troy Simon v. Albert Woodson, Sheriff of Lamar County, Texas
See Mastrian v. Hed-man, 326 F.2d 708 (8th Cir. 1964), cert, denied 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 ; Pilkington v. Circuit Court of Howell County, Mo., 324 F.2d 45 (8th Cir. 1963); Hernandez v. Heyd, 307 F.Supp. 826 (E.D.La.1970); Wansley v. Wilkerson, 263 F.Supp. 54 (W.D.Va. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hernandez v. Heyd
See Mastrian v. Hedman, 8 Cir. 1964, 326 F.2d 708 , cert. denied, 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 ; Pilkinton v. Circuit Court of Howell County, Mo., 8 Cir. 1963, 324 F.2d 45 ; Wansley v. Wilkerson, W.D.Va. 1967, 263 F.Supp. 54 ; Henderson v. Dutton, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 375 ; United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Stephen Nathdrine Cheely v. United States
Ed.2d 425 ; see Twining v. United States, 5th Cir. 1963, 321 F.2d 432, 435 , cert. denied, 1964, 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1126 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nowaczyk v. New Hampshire
See also Mastrian v. Hedman, 326 F.2d 708, 711 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tallice Andrews and Thurston Brooks
(2×)
See also, Mastrian v. Hedman, 326 F.2d 708 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 . 76 While the underlying facts in Bordenkircher v. Hayes sufficiently differ from those here to persuade me that it is not controlling, still its logic and language are highly persuasive.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bobick v. Schaeffer
See, e. g., Mastrian v. Hedman, 326 F.2d 708 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 (1964); Turco v. Maryland, 324 F.Supp. 61 (D.Md.1971), affirmed, 444 F.2d 56 (4th Cir. 1971); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Edwin A. Goodman v. H. William Kehl, Sheriff of New York County
See, e. g., Mastrian v. Hedman, 326 F.2d 708 (8 Cir.), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1128 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 (1964); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lopez
See also Twining v. United States, 321 F.2d 432 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. den. 376 U.S. 965 , 84 S.Ct. 1126 , 11 L.Ed.2d 982 ; Post v. Boles, 218 F.Supp. 658 (N.D.W.Va.1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rogers
v.
Russell, Correctional Superintendent
v.
Russell, Correctional Superintendent
No. 1067, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1964.
Published
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.