neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO.
v.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
21.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1965.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN.
John C. Danielson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jordan Jay Hillman.
Frank M. Long argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Philip H. Porter, R. K. Merrill and Richard R. Robinson.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is reversed. Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 270 U. S. 266, 278.