Drum v. Seawell, 383 U.S. 831 (1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Drum v. Seawell, 383 U.S. 831 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Street v. State (mdctspecapp, 1975-05-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Street v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jenkins v. State, 238 Md. 451, 464-466 , 209 A. 2d 616, 624 (1965) vacated on other grounds, per curiam, 383 U. S. 834 , 86 S. Ct. 1237 (1966); Fowler v. State, 237 Md. 508, 512 , 206 A. 2d 802, 804 (1965); Crawford v. State, 9 Md.
examined Cited "see" Baker v. Bindner (6×)
W.D. Ky. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Drum v. Seawell, D.C., 249 F.Supp. 877 (1965), affirmed 383 U.S. 831 , 86 S.Ct. 1237 , 16 L.Ed.2d 298 (1967); and Baker v. Clement, D.C., 247 F.Supp. 886 , 3 judges sitting, M.D.Tenn. (1965).
discussed Cited "see" Kilgarlin v. Hill (2×)
SCOTUS · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Drum v. Seawell, 383 U. S. 831 ; Toombs v. Fortson, 384 U. S. 210 .
examined Cited "see" Jones v. Falcey (3×)
N.J. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Drum v. Seawell, supra, 250 F. Supp., at p. 925 , affirmed without opinion (and perhaps without reference to the issue at hand), 383 U. S. 831 , 86 S. Ct. 1237 , 16 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DRUM ET AL.
v.
SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.
1128.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1966.
383 U.S. 831
Per Curiam.
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA.

Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.

T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed.