Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Florida, Inc., 385 U.S. 11 (1966). · Go Syfert
Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Florida, Inc., 385 U.S. 11 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“absent any overriding public interest in having the restricted employee's services available to it, ... the guidelines to be followed in enforcing any such contract are reasonableness as to time and as to area.”
26 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sarasota Beverage Co. v. Johnson (fladistctapp, 1989-08-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Sarasota Beverage Co. v. Johnson
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
absent any overriding public interest in having the restricted employee's services available to it, ... the guidelines to be followed in enforcing any such contract are reasonableness as to time and as to area.
discussed Cited "see" Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Bailey
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Florida, Inc., 183 So.2d 532 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 11 , 87 S.Ct. 78 , 17 L.Ed.2d 10 (1966); Kverne v. Rollins Protective Services Co., 515 So.2d 1320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
discussed Cited "see" Xerographics, Inc. v. Thomas
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 183 So.2d 532, 534-35 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 11 , 87 S.Ct. 78 , 17 L.Ed.2d 10 (1966); Kverne at 1321; Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin, 482 So.2d 486 , 491 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).
discussed Cited "see" Tiffany Sands, Inc. v. Mezhibovsky
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Puga v. Suave Shoe Corp., 374 So.2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); see generally Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Company of Florida, 183 So.2d 532 (Fla.), appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 11 , 87 S.Ct. 78 , 17 L.Ed.2d 10 (1966) (Florida courts are committed to the enforcement of non-competition agreements because of the uniqueness and difficulty in proving money damages); Suave Shoe Corp. v. Fernandez, 390 So.2d 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (same).
cited Cited "see" Empiregas, Inc. v. Thomas
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla., Inc., 183 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1966), app. dism. 385 U.S. 11 , 87 S.Ct. 78 , 17 L.Ed.2d 10 ; Miller Mechanical, Inc. v. Ruth, 300 So.2d 11 (Fla. 1974).
Capelouto
v.
Orkin Exterminating Co. of Florida, Inc.
316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1966.
385 U.S. 11
Wilfred C. Varn for appellant., /. Lewis Hall for appellee.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: District Court of Appeal of Fl… (1)
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.