green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harry J. Binder v. United States
(2×)
See also Rose v. United States, 256 F.2d 223, 226-27 (3d Cir. 1958), and Fortugno v. Commissioner, 353 F.2d 429, 433-35 (3d Cir. 1965), Cert. dismissed, 385 U.S. 954 , 87 S.Ct. 337 , 17 L.Ed.2d 302 (1966). 1 43 It is clear, therefore, that the taxpayer is not foreclosed from recovering his money simply because the statute of limitations applicable to a claim for refund of an overpayment has expired.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Colbert
v.
United States Sliva v. Pennsylvania Bates v. Veterans Administration White v. Forte Cedillo v. United States Greenway v. United States Hunt v. Oliver, Warden Hartford v. United States Mabe v. Pilson Graddy v. Tessel Jones v. United States Brown v. Boles, Warden
v.
United States Sliva v. Pennsylvania Bates v. Veterans Administration White v. Forte Cedillo v. United States Greenway v. United States Hunt v. Oliver, Warden Hartford v. United States Mabe v. Pilson Graddy v. Tessel Jones v. United States Brown v. Boles, Warden
No. 61; No. 97; No. 227; No. 265; No. 368; No. 419; No. 424; No. 460; No. 480; No. 490; No. 495; No. 500.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1966.
385 U.S. 954
Published
ante, p. 855;
ante, p. 858;
ante, p. 868;
ante, p. 871;
ante, p. 805;
ante, p. 881;
ante, p. 904;
ante, p. 883;
ante, p. 884;
ante, p. 885;
ante, p. 885; and
ante, p. 886. Petitions for rehearing denied.