green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re MEB
(2×)
See Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 204, 358 F.2d 833, 835 (1966) (citing Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct. 1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963)), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re M.E.B.
See Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 204, 358 F.2d 833, 835 (1966) (citing Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct. 1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963)), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haywood v. United States
(2×)
See Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 204, 358 F.2d 833 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967); accord Rucker v. United States, 455 A.2d 889, 891 (D.C. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tate
Accord, Smith v. United States, 358 F.2d 833, 835 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967) (“The correct test is whether a warrant if sought could have been obtained by law enforcement agency application which disclosed its corporate information, not whether any one particular officer could have obtained it on what information he individually possessed.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Moore
See People v. Nettles, 34 Ill.2d 52 , 213 N.E.2d 536 (1966), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967) ; People v. Luckey, 90 Ill.App.2d 325 , 234 N.E.2d 26 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kraft
See Smith v. United States, 123 U.S. App. D.C. 202 , 358 F.2d 833 (1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967)." Id. at 122.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reies Lopex Tijerina
See Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 358 F.2d 833, 835 , cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 ; and Wood v. Crouse, 436 F.2d 1077 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 1010 , 91 S.Ct. 2193 , 29 L.Ed.2d 432 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Esmeraldo Gazard Colon
See Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 358 F.2d 833 (1966), cert. denied 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkerson v. State
See Enrique v. State, 501 S.W.2d 117, 120 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); and Kemner, 589 S.W.2d at 404 ; see also Martinez v. State, 407 S.W.2d 504, 505 (Tex.Crim.App.1966) and Acosta v. State, 403 S.W.2d 434, 438 (Tex.Crim.App.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1352 , 18 L.Ed.2d 449 (1967)." See also Castro v. State, supra; Basaldua v. State, 481 S.W.2d 851 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkerson v. State
See Enrique v. State, 501 S.W.2d 117, 120 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); and Kemner, 589 S.W.2d at 404 ; see also Martinez v. State, 407 S.W.2d 504, 505 (Tex.Crim.App.1966) and Acosta v. State, 403 S.W.2d 434, 438 (Tex.Crim.App.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1352 , 18 L.Ed.2d 449 (1967).” See also Castro v. State, supra; Basaldua v. State, 481 S.W.2d 851 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilkerson v. State
See also Martinez v. State, 407 S.W.2d 504, 505 (Tex.Crim.App.1966) and Acosta v. State, 403 S.W.2d 434, 438 (Tex.Crim.App.1966), ce rt. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1352 , 18 L.Ed.2d 449 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Davis
See also Smith v. United States (D.C.Cir.1966), 358 F.2d 833, 835 , cert. den., 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 ; People v. Saars (1978), 196 Colo. 294 , 584 P.2d 622, 625 ; State v. Miller (1975), 112 Ariz. 95 , 537 P.2d 965, 967 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phenix v. State
Garcia v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 273 , 298 S.W.2d 831 (1957); Daltwas v. State, 375 S.W.2d 732 (Tex.Cr.App.1964); see also Acosta v. State, 403 S.W.2d 434 (Tex.Cr.App.1966), cert, denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1352 , 18 L.Ed.2d 449 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. State
See e. g., Acosta v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 434 , cert. denied 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1352 , 18 L.Ed.2d 449 (1966), where the return was not made until the day of the trial; Daltwas v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 375 S.W.2d 732 , where no return was made on the warrant; and Campbell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 373 S.W.2d 749 , where no sworn return was made on the warrant.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Croker v. State
See also Brooks v. United States, 5 Cir., 416 F.2d 1044, 1048 , and the comment of Circuit Judge Burger (now Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court) in Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 358 F.2d 833, 835 , certiorari denied 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 , to the effect that "The correct test is whether a warrant if sought could have been obtained by law enforcement agency application which disclosed its corporate information, not whether any one particular officer could have obtained it on what information he individually possessed." With respect to poin…
Nettles
v.
Illinois
v.
Illinois
No. 123.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1967.
386 U.S. 1008
Louis P. Yangas for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Ill.