green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sager
(2×)
See State v. Tettamble, 394 S.W.2d 375, 379 (Mo.1965), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 386 U.S. 265 , 87 S.Ct. 1034 , 18 L.Ed.2d 42 (1967), on remand, 431 S.W.2d 441 (Mo.1968), appeal after remand, 450 S.W.2d 191 (Mo.1970), where the court held as a rule that “. . . time is not of the essence of the offense of homicide.” Therefore, a specific time need not be included in jury instructions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary v. William B. Donnell
(2×)
See also Tettamble v. Missouri, 386 U.S. 265 , 87 S.Ct. 1034 , 18 L.Ed.2d 42 (March 13, 1967), reversing per curiam, State v. Tettamble, 394 S.W.2d 375 (Mo.1965), a post-Douglas decision. 3 .
Tettamble
v.
Missouri
v.
Missouri
32, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 13, 1967.
Petitioner pro se., Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Harold L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in jornia pauperis and the petition for- a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration in light of Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258.