green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
(2×)
See 39 Ill. 2d, at 599-600 , 237 N. E. 2d, at 502 (“Too, the United States Supreme Court on January 15,1968, dismissed an appeal in School Committee of Boston v. Board of Education, (Mass. 1967) 227 N. E. 2d 729 , which challenged the statute providing for elimination of racial imbalance in public schools ‘for want of a substantial federal question.’ 389 U. S. 572”).
cited
Cited "see"
Scott v. Fairbanks Capital Corp.
See James v. Gilmore, 389 U.S. 572 , 88 S.Ct. 695 , 19 L.Ed.2d 783 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
American Dog Owners Association, Inc. v. Lynn
See School Comm. of Boston v. Board of Educ., 352 Mass. 693, 697 (1967), appeal dismissed, 389 U.S. 572 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Haverhill Manor, Inc. v. Commissioner of Public Welfare
See School *30 Comm. of Boston v. Board of Educ. 352 Mass. 693, 701 (1967), opp. dism. for want of a substantial Federal question, 389 U. S. 572 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Opinion of the Justices to the Governor
See School Comm. of Boston v. Board of Educ. 352 Mass. 693, 698 (1967), appeal dism. 389 U. S. 572 (where this court, in upholding the constitutionality of the racial imbalance law, noted that the Boston School Committee seemed “bent on stifling the act before it has a fair chance to become fully operative” ).
cited
Cited "see"
Baughman v. Freienmuth
See Gilmore v. James, 274 F.Supp. 75 (N.D.Texas) (three-judge court), aff’d, 389 U.S. 572 , 88 S.Ct. 695 , 19 L.Ed.2d 783 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Passel v. Fort Worth Independent School District
(2×)
See Gilmore v. James, 274 F.Supp. 75 (D.C.Tex.) aff’d 389 U.S. 572 , 88 S.Ct. 695 , 19 L.Ed.2d 783 , reh. den. 390 U.S. 975 , 88 S.Ct. 1027 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1195 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Metropolitan Area Housing Alliance v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
See, e. g., Gilmore v. James, 274 F.Supp. 75, 87 (N.D.Tex.1967) (3 Judge Ct.), affirmed, 389 U.S. 572 , 88 S.Ct. 695 , 19 L.Ed.2d 783 (1968) (per curiam); Eskra v. Morton, 524 F.2d 9, 10 (7th Cir. 1975), rev’g on other grounds, 380 F.Supp. 205 (E.D.Wis.1974); Sullivan v. Houston Independent School District, 307 F.Supp. 1328, 1337-38 (S.D.Tex.1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Education
See also School Comm. of Boston v. Board of Educ. 352 Mass. 693, 698 , opp. dism. 389 U. S. 572 .
JAMES, STATE TREASURER OF TEXAS, ET AL.
v.
GILMORE ET AL.
v.
GILMORE ET AL.
850.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1968.
389 U.S. 572
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.
Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, and J. C. Davis, W. O. Shultz II and James C. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellants.
David R. Richards for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.