green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Union Oil Company of California
But see State of Wyoming v. Udall, 379 F.2d 635, 638 (10th Cir. 1967), cert. den., 389 U.S. 985 , 88 S.Ct. 470 , 19 L.Ed.2d 479 (1967) ; Ahne v. Reinhart and Donovan Company, 240 Ark. 691 , 401 S.W.2d 565, 569 (Ark.1966). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Beres v. States
See Wyoming v. Udall, 379 F.2d 635, 640 (10th Cir.1967) (“For the purposes of this case, we are not impressed with the labels applied to the title of the railroads in their rights-of-way across the public lands of the United States.”), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 985 , 88 S.Ct. 470 , 19 L.Ed.2d 479 (1967); see also Idaho v. Oregon Short Line, 617 F.Supp. at 210 (recognizing that “[b]ecause exclusive use and occupancy are not rights comprised within the traditional definition of an easement, definitional problems later arose in describing the nature of a railroad’s interest in its right-of-w…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bankruptcy Estate of United Shipping Co. v. Tucker Co.
(2×)
See id.; accord ETS-Hokin & Galvan, Inc. v. Maas Transport, Inc., 380 F.2d 258, 260-61 (8th Cir.1967) (since ICA does not show Congress intended to void private contracts which violate the Act, plaintiff's failure to file rates as required by ICA did not void private contract and carrier could collect agreed-upon rate), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 977 , 88 S.Ct. 481 , 19 L.Ed.2d 471 (1967); Concord Indus., Inc. v. K.T.I.
cited
Cited "see"
Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.
See Ets-Hokin & Galvan, Inc. v. Maas Transp., Inc., 380 F.2d 258, 261 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 977 , 88 S.Ct. 481 , 19 L.Ed.2d 471 (1967); Concord Indus., Inc. v. K.T.I.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. United States
See also Jackson v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 29, 37 , 1967 WL 8858 (1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 985 , 88 S.Ct. 468 , 19 L.Ed.2d 478 (1967) where the court stated that plaintiffs’ “present claims for back pay are related to their criminal convictions only in the sense that each claim was premised upon common factual elements ... [and] in no sense dependent upon ... [plaintiffs’] first securing a reversal of the court-martial....” Furthermore, “[a]ny later judicial pronouncements simply explain, but do not create, the operative effect.” Catawba Indian Tribe v. United States, 982 F…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
v.
Johnston
v.
Johnston
No. 657.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1967.
Clyde J. Watts for petitioner., Payne H. Ratner for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Okla. Certiorari denied.