green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“an impairment that can be remedied by treatment will not serve as the basis for a finding of disability.”
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jennie Miller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
an impairment that can be remedied by treatment will not serve as the basis for a finding of disability.
discussed
Cited "see"
Aubrey GEORGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee
See Henry v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 191 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 993 , 88 S.Ct. 492 , 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967); Mullis v. Bowen, 861 F.2d 991, 994 (6th Cir.1988). 3 Appellant distinguishes himself from the claimants in these eases because he does not seek to recover any benefits for his prior period of disability, but rather seeks only to exclude the prior period from the calculation of his insured status.
cited
Cited "see"
Betty S. Coleman v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare of the United States
See Henry v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 191 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 993 , 88 S.Ct. 492 , 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Selig v. Richardson
See Henry v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 191, 195 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 993 , 88 S.Ct. 492 , 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967), rehearing denied, 389 U.S. 1060 , 88 S.Ct. 797 , 19 L.Ed.2d 864 (1968); Piper v. Richardson, 315 F. Supp. 234, 237 (W.D.Pa.1970). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Cobbs, and Charles Julius Thomas
See, United States v. Smith, 7th Cir., 379 F.2d 628, 633 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 993 , 88 S.Ct. 491 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcia Lyon and Anton Lysczyk
(2×)
See United States v. Smith, 7 Cir., 379 F.2d 628 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 993 , 88 S.Ct. 491 , 19 L.Ed.2d 486 (1967); United States v. Gardner, supra; United States v. Accardi, 2 Cir., 342 F.2d 697 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 954 , 86 S.Ct. 426 , 15 L.Ed.2d 359 (1965). 24 As a sixth ground for reversal, appellants contend the trial court erred in reading Count I of the indictment to the jury and instructing them that to convict on Count I they must find that one or both of the appellants committed one of the overt acts alleged in the count.
discussed
Cited "see"
Aubrey GEORGE v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security
See Henry v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 191 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 993 , 88 S.Ct. 492 , 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967); Mullis v. Bowen, 861 F.2d 991, 994 (6th Cir.1988).3 Appellant distinguishes himself from the claimants in these cases because he does not seek to recover any benefits for his prior period of disability, but rather seeks only to exclude the prior period from the calculation of his insured status.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Begley v. Weinberger
See, e. g., Henry v. Gardner, 381 F.2d 191, 195 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 389 U.S. 993 , 88 S.Ct. 492 , 19 L.Ed.2d 487 (1967); Boles v. Celebrezze, 210 F.Supp. 856, 857 (W.D.Va.1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
Cameron, Hospital Superintendent
v.
Cameron, Hospital Superintendent
No. 474.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1967.
389 U.S. 993
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.