green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary James Eagan v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden
(2×)
See Bell v. United States, 382 F.2d 985, 987 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 965 , 88 S.Ct. 1070 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1165 (1968)." 93 Id. at 1115-16 (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Ruben Williams v. John Twomey and Peter Bensinger
(2×)
See Bell v. United States, 382 F.2d 985, 987 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 965 , 88 S.Ct. 1070 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1165 (1968)." 35 While the Johnson case does not set out the entire warning given there, the fair inference seems to be that the remainder of the statement complies with the Miranda requirements.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. J. W. Johnson, Adolphus Foston and Harry Johnson
See Bell v. United States, 382 F.2d 985, 987 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 965 , 88 S. Ct. 1070 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1165 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Perez
See also Bell v. United States, 382 F.2d 985 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 965 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Malone
See, e.g., United States v. Knight, 395 F.2d 971 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 930 , Nobles v. United States, 391 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1968), Bell v. United States, 382 F.2d 985 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 965 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 895.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1968.
390 U.S. 965
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.