green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Cynthia McCahey v. L.P. Investors, Allen M. Rosenthal, Affiliated Credit Adjusters, Sheriff of Suffolk County, Suffolk County Clerk
(6×)
See Moya v. DeBaca, 395 U.S. 825 , 89 S.Ct. 2136 , 23 L.Ed.2d 740 (1969) appeal dismissed, (Harlan, Brennan, JJ., dissenting in light of Sniadach ); Hanner v. DeMarcus, 390 U.S. 736, 742 , 88 S.Ct. 1437, 1441 , 20 L.Ed.2d 270 (1967) cert. dismissed as improvidently granted (Douglas, J., dissenting) ("Is there any more reason to accept in this case the Endicott fiction of constructive notice because of knowledge of the underlying judgment than there was in Griffin ?”). .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Halpern v. Austin
(3×)
See also Moya v. DeBaca, 286 F.Supp. 606 (D.N.M.1968), appeal dismissed per curiam, 395 U.S. 825 , 89 S.Ct. 2136 , 23 L.Ed.2d 740 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MOYA Et Ux.
v.
DeBACA, Dba DeBACA & CO. CREDIT & COLLECTION AGENCY, Et Al.
v.
DeBACA, Dba DeBACA & CO. CREDIT & COLLECTION AGENCY, Et Al.
996 M.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1969.
William G. Fitzpatrick, Jr., for appellants., Claud S. Mann for DeBaca et al., and Boston E. Witt, Attorney General, and James V. Noble, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico, appellees.
Brennan, Harlan, Sniadach.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Brennan would vacate the judgment and remand the case in light of Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, ante, p. 337.