green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“the restoration of civil rights is part of the pardon power and as such is an act of executive clemency not subject to judicial control.”
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
George Hawkins v. Youngkin
the restoration of civil rights is part of the pardon power and as such is an act of executive clemency not subject to judicial control.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
George Hawkins v. Glenn Youngkin
The Supreme Court summarily affirmed in a one-sentence, per curiam order. 396 U.S. at 12.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Governor of Florida
(2×)
See Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 , 94 S.Ct. 2655 , 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974), Hunter v. Underwood, 471 U.S. 222 , 105 S.Ct. 1916 , 85 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), Beacham v. Braterman, 300 F.Supp. 182, 183 (1969), aff'd 396 U.S. 12 , 90 S.Ct. 153 , 24 L.Ed.2d 11 (1969) (finding by a three judge panel that Florida’s decision to disenfranchise felons was not a violation of the plaintiffs equal protection or due process rights).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Johnson v. Governor of the State of FL
(2×)
See Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 , 94 S.Ct. 2655 , 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974), Hunter v. Underwood, 471 U.S. 222 , 105 S.Ct. 1916 , 85 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), Beacham v. Braterman, 300 F.Supp. 182, 183 (1969), aff'd 396 U.S. 12 , 90 S.Ct. 153 , 24 L.Ed.2d 11 (1969) (finding by a three judge panel that Florida's decision to disenfranchise felons was not a violation of the plaintiff's equal protection or due process rights).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferguson v. Williams
(2×)
Accord, Beachan v. Braterman, 300 F.Supp. 182 (S.D.Fla. 1969, 3-judge court), motion to affirm granted without opinion, 396 U.S. 12 , 90 S.Ct. 153 , 24 L.Ed.2d 11 (1969); Kronlund v. Honstein, 327 F.Supp. 71 (N.D.Ga.1971, 3-judge court).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Fussenich
(4×)
See, e. g., Beacham v. Braterman, 300 F.Supp. 182, 184 (S.D.Fla.) (three-judge court), aff'd 396 U.S. 12 , 90 S.Ct. 153 , 24 L.Ed.2d 11 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BEACHAM
v.
BRATERMAN Et Al.
v.
BRATERMAN Et Al.
404.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1969.
Bruce S. Rogow for appellant., Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and James McGuirk, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
Douglas.
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (1)
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.