Harling v. United States, 397 U.S. 917 (1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Harling v. United States, 397 U.S. 917 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Giddens v. State (alacrimapp, 1990-06-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Giddens v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pollack, 417 F.2d 240 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 917 , 90 S.Ct. 924 , 25 L.Ed.2d 98 (1970); United States v. Prevatt, 526 F.2d 400 (5th Cir.1976); Bowmar Instrument Corp. v. Fidelity Electronics, Ltd., Inc., 466 So.2d 344 (Fla.Dist.App. 1985) (Florida has a statute which specifically deals with the introduction of summaries of voluminous materials).
cited Cited "see" United States v. DePalma
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Piccini, 412 F.2d 591 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 917 , 90 S.Ct. 923 , 25 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Wartson v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pitts v. State, Okl.Cr., 431 P.2d 449 (1967) and White v. State, Okl.Cr., 458 P.2d 322 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 917 , 90 S.Ct. 922 , 25 L.Ed.2d 98 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
2d Cir. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Piccini, 412 F.2d 591, 593 (2d Cir.1969) (“The instruction claimed to be privileged, however, was given by [the defendant] as an officer of the corporation, so that the privilege, if any, was that of the corporation, and may not be availed of by [the defendant].”), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 917 , 90 S.Ct. 923 , 25 L.Ed.2d 98 (1970); In re Bevill, 805 F.2d at 124 (“[A]ny privilege that exists as to a corporate officer’s role and functions within a corporation belongs to the corporation, not the officer.”); Diversified Indus., Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 596 , 6…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-Cio
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Piccini, 412 F.2d 591, 593 (2d Cir.1969) ("The instruction claimed to be privileged, however, was given by [the defendant] as an officer of the corporation, so that the privilege, if any, was that of the corporation, and may not be availed of by [the defendant]."), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 917 , 90 S.Ct. 923 , 25 L.Ed.2d 98 (1970); In re Bevill, 805 F.2d at 124 ("[A]ny privilege that exists as to a corporate officer's role and functions within a corporation belongs to the corporation, not the officer."); Diversified Indus., Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 596 , 611 n. 5 (8…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harling
v.
United States
No. 983.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1970.
397 U.S. 917
Marvin S. Nepom for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, and Robert V. Zener for the United States.
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.