green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Erickson v. Commissioner of the Department of Human Services for the State
(2×)
See Grubb v. Sterrett, 315 F.Supp. 990, 995-96 (N.D.Ind.) (stating there is a "federal requirement that corrective payments are to be made retroactive to the date the incorrect action was taken when an appeal hearing is favorable to the claimant," holding AFDC benefits were to be paid "retroactive to the date of the incorrect denial or termination"), aff'd, 400 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 187 , 27 L.Ed.2d 182 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Shonkwiler v. Heckler
See, Grubb v. Sterrett, 315 F.Supp. 990 (N.D.Ind.1970), aff' d, 400 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 187 , 27 L.Ed.2d 182 ; Bond v. Stanton, 655 F.2d 766 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruth M. Archibald v. Frank Whaland
See Gaither v. Sterrett, 315 F.Supp. 990 (N.D.Ind.), aff’d mem., 400 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 187 , 27 L.Ed.2d 182 (1970); Uhrovick v. Lavine, 43 A.D.2d 481 , 352 N.Y.S.2d 529 , aff’d., 35 N.Y.2d 892 , 364 N.Y.S.2d 890 , 324 N.E.2d 360 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barela v. New Mexico Department of Human Services, Income Support Division
See also Grubb v. Sterrett, 315 F.Supp. 990 (N.D.Ind.), aff’d, 400 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 187 , 27 L.Ed.2d 182 (1970); Ojeda v. Hackney, 319 F.Supp. 149 (N.D.Tex. 1970); In re Fowler, 130 Vt. 176 , 288 A.2d 463 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaither v. Sterrett
See, e. g., Grubb v. Sterrett, 315 F.Supp. 990 (N.D.Ind.1970), aff’d mem., 400 U.S. 922 , 91 S.Ct. 187 , 27 L.Ed.2d 182 (1971); Solman v. Shapiro, 300 F.Supp. 409 , 411 n. 1 (D.Conn.1969), aff’d mem., 396 U.S. 5 , 90 S.Ct. 25 , 24 L.Ed.2d 5 (1969).
Sterrett, Administrator, Department of Public Welfare of Indiana
v.
Grubb
v.
Grubb
No. 626.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 23, 1970.
Are, Black, Harlan, Noted, Set, Should.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Motion of appellee Grubb for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. D. Ind.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent. They are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.