Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 400 U.S. 939 (1970). · Go Syfert
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 400 U.S. 939 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Froehlke (mowd, 1972-10-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Froehlke
W.D. Mo. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See 400 U.S. 939 , 91 S.Ct. 231 , 27 L.Ed.2d 262 .
discussed Cited "see" Daly v. Volpe (2×)
W.D. Wash. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Named Individual Members of the San Antonio Conservation Society et al. v. Texas Highway Dept. et al., 446 F.2d 1013, 1028 (5th Cir. 1971), reh. and reh. en banc den. 446 F.2d at 1029 , stay and cert. granted, 400 U.S. 939 , 91 S.Ct. 231 , 27 L.Ed.2d 262 , stay vac., 400 U.S. 961 , 91 S.Ct. 361 , 27 L.Ed.2d 381 , cert. den. 400 U.S. 967 , 91 S.Ct. 363 , 27 L.Ed.2d 388 , reh. den. 401 U.S. 926 , 91 S.Ct. 884 , 27 L.Ed.2d 830 ; Morningside-Lenox Park Assn. v. Volpe et al., 334 F.Supp. 132 (N.D.Ga.1971); Nolop v. Volpe et al., 333 F.Supp. 1364 (D.So.Dak.1971); LaRaza Unida v. Volpe et al., 33…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc.
v.
Volpe, Secretary of Transportation
No. 1066.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1970.
400 U.S. 939
Consideration, Matters, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending issuance of judgment of this Court. Treating the application for stay and briefs in opposition as a.petition for writ of certiorari and opposition thereto, certiorari granted and case set for oral argument on Monday, January 11, 1971. Briefs for petitioners shall be filed by December 21, 1970, and briefs for respondents shall be filed by January 4, 1971. Briefs may be typewritten if counsel are unable to- file printed briefs by these dates. Motions of Committee of 100 on the Federal City, Inc., and City of Memphis et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of these matters.