green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Rush Pettway, Etc. v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor
(6×)
But see, Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324, 331 (6th Cir. 1970), aff'd. per curiam, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971) (equally divided court). 115 Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., supra, 491 F.2d a5 1375-1380; Head v. Timken Roller Bearing Co., supra, 486 F.2d 874 -875; Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., supra, 457 F.2d 1377 ; Caldwell v. National Brewing Co., supra, 443 F.2d 1044 ; Sanders v. Dobbs Houses, supra, 431 F.2d at 1101 ; Lazard v. Boeing Co., supra, 322 f.Supp. 345-346.
examined
Cited "but see"
Amanda Cooper v. Philip Morris, Inc., Tobacco Workers International Union Local No. 16
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir. 1970), aff’d per curiam without opinion, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971) (4-4 decision) (arbitration award interpreting collective bargaining contract).
examined
Cited "but see"
Marina VOUTSIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
(3×)
But see Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir. 1970), aff’d per curiam without opinion, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971) (4-4 decision) (arbitration award interpreting collective bargaining contract) . 11 We express no opinion, however, on the question whether appellant could, without the federal commission’s consent, bind herself to a settlement after filing her federal complaint.
cited
Cited "see"
M. William Haskins v. Michael Brown
See Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324, 332 (6th Cir.1970), aff'd, 402 U.S. 689 (1971); Piper v. Meco, Inc., 412 F.2d 752 (6th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 944 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kemling v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.
(2×)
See Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co. (6th Cir. 1970), 429 F. 2d 324 , aff'd (1971), 402 U.S. 689 , 29 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Constitutionality of Bill Allowing Federal Employees to TakeTime Off to Participate in Religious Observances
See, Dewey v. Reynolds M etals C o., 429 F. (2d) 324 (6th Cir. 1970), a ffd , 402 U.S. 689 (1971); Parker Seal Co. v. Cummins, 516 F. (2d) 544 (6th Cir. 1975), a ff d, 429 U .S. 65 (1976).
examined
Cited "see"
Jeffries v. Harris County Community Action Ass'n
(3×)
See Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324, 328 (6th Cir. 1970), aff’d, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1970); Tidwell v. American Oil Co., 332 F.Supp. 424, 430, 436 (D.Utah 1971); Barnes v. Lerner Shops of Texas, Inc., 323 F.Supp. 617 (S.D.Tex.1971). 9.
examined
Cited "see"
Gerstle v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
(3×)
See Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir. 1970), aff'd by an equally divided Court, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971).
examined
Cited "see"
Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Division
(6×)
See Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir.), affirmed by an equally divided court, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S. Ct. 2186 , 29 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.L. Seech v. Gateway School District
See also Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324, 332 (6th Cir. 1970) (holding a suit by employee alleging a Title VII civil rights violation could not be brought in court after the employee’s grievance, based on the same civil rights violation, had been finally adjudicated by arbitration), aff’d by an equally divided court, 402 U.S. 689 (1971), superseded by statute, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000e(j).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterson v. Wilmur Communications, Inc.
(3×)
See, e.g., Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971) (per curiam), aff'g by an equally divided court 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir.1970); Riley v. Bendix Corp., 330 F.Supp. 583 (M.D.Fla.1971).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Joan RUDOLPH, Appellant, v. WAGNER ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Appellee
(6×)
See also Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 300 F.Supp. 709 (W.D.Mich.1969), Rev'd and remanded, reh. denied, 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir. 1970), Aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971) 7 Rudolph cites Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650 , 85 S.Ct. 614 , 13 L.Ed.2d 580 (1965), as authority upon which her attorney might have relied in believing that she was required to pursue her contract remedies prior to going into federal court.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Wondzell v. Alaska Wood Products, Inc.
(6×)
Compare, e.g., Riley v. Bendix Corporation, 464 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir.1972), and Yott v. North American Rockwell Corporation, supra (upholding the guideline), with Reid v. Memphis Publishing Company, 521 F.2d 512 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 964 , 97 S.Ct. 394 , 50 L.Ed.2d 333 (1976), and Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Company, 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir.1970), aff'd (by an equally divided court), 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971) (questioning the authority of the E.E.O.C. to adopt the guideline).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kewin v. Board of Education of the Melvindale-Northern Allen Park Public Schools
See, also, Botany Industries, Inc v New York Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers, 375 F Supp 485, 490-491 (SD NY, 1974), vacated on other grounds, 506 F2d 1246 (CA 2, 1974), Riley v Bendix Corp, 330 F Supp 583, 590 (MD Fla, 1971), rev’d on other grounds, 464 F2d 1113 (CA 5, 1972), Dewey v Reynolds Metals Co, 300 F Supp 709, 713 (WD Mich, 1969), rev’d on other grounds, 429 F2d 324 (CA 6, 1970), aff’d by equally divided court, 402 US 689 ; 91 S Ct 2186 ; 29 L Ed 2d 267 (1971).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Held v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
(3×)
See also Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324, 331-334 (6th Cir.), aff’d by an equally divided court, 402 U.S. 689 , 91 S.Ct. 2186 , 29 L.Ed.2d 267 (1971); Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 346 F.Supp. 1012 (D.Colo.1971), aff’d, 466 F.2d 1209 (10th Cir. 1972), cert. granted, 410 U.S. 925 , 93 S.Ct. 1398 , 35 L.Ed.2d 586 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DEWEY
v.
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
v.
REYNOLDS METALS CO.
835.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1971.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 101 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
Donald F. Oosterhouse argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
William A. Coughlin, Jr., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Fred R. Edney.
Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Leonard, David L. Rose, Stanley P. Hebert, Julia P. Cooper, and George H. Darden.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by Nathan Lewin, Samuel Rabinove, and Sol Rabkin for the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs et al., and by Paul S. Berger, Joseph B. Robison, and Beverly Coleman for the American Jewish Congress.
Milton A. Smith and Jay S. Siegel filed a brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.