green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Diamond v. Bland
Subsequently the United States Supreme Court on four occasions denied respondents' petitions for certiorari and rehearing ( 402 U.S. 988 *336 [ 29 L.Ed.2d 153 , 91 S.Ct. 1661 ]; 404 U.S. 874 [ 30 L.Ed.2d 120 , 92 S.Ct. 27 ]; 405 U.S. 981 [ 31 L.Ed.2d 257 , 92 S.Ct. 1189 ]; 409 U.S. 897 [ 34 L.Ed.2d 154 , 93 S.Ct. 91 ]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Levin v. May
See Clement A. Evans & Company v. McAlpine, 434 F.2d 100, 104 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 ; Dupuy v. Dupuy, 551 F.2d 1005, 1017-19 (5th Cir.1977). [6] Stated somewhat differently, "[t]he purpose of due diligence in the context of a proposed acquisition transaction is to provide the potential acquiror with sufficient information regarding the target company so that the acquiror may make a reasoned decision as to whether or not to pursue such a transaction...." David A. Katz, Due Diligence in Acquisition Transactions, 1368 PLI/Corp 271 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Earnest Bach and Robert Pryor v. Joseph S. Coughlin
See Schoop v. Mitchell, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 405 , 444 F.2d 863 (1971), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1663 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971); Todd v. Joint Apprenticeship Committee, 332 F.2d 243 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 914 , 85 S.Ct. 880 , 13 L.Ed.2d 800 (1965); In re Chicago Rys., 168 F.2d 65 (7th Cir. 1948).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Weaver v. United Mine Workers of America, W. A. Boyle v. Richard Weaver
E. g., Cadillac Publishing Co. v. Summerfield, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 343 , 267 F.2d 620 (1958); Dulles v. Nathan, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 190 , 225 F.2d 29 (1955); Acheson v. Droesse, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 143 , 197 F.2d 574 (1952); see Schoop v. Mitchell, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 405 , 444 F.2d 863 , cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1663 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971); Anderson v. Morgan, 105 U.S.App.D.C. 66 , 263 F.2d 903 , cert. denied, 361 U.S. 846 , 80 S.Ct. 99 , 4 L.Ed.2d 84 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
Anna Masszonia v. Walter E. Washington
See Schoop v. Mitchell, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 405, 406 , 444 F.2d 863, 864 , cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1663 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971); Cadillac Pub.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,767, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,823 Dr. W. B. Landry, Bryan Zeringue and Curtis Chauvin, Cross-Appellees v. All American Assurance Company, Republic Securities Corp., Defendants-Third-Party v. Bank of St. Charles & Trust Company, Third-Party Cross-Appellants
See also Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 434 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Landry v. All American Assurance Co.
See also Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 434 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,702, 7 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1080 Paul F. Newton & Company and Daniel O'connell, Receiver v. Texas Commerce Bank, Pressman, Frohlic & Frost
See also Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 434 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul F. Newton & Co. v. Texas Commerce Bank
See also Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 434 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 5.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tyrone Smith, United States of America v. Anthony E. Gartrell
See, e. g., Sutton v. United States, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 188 , 434 F.2d 462 (1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1676 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971); Mysholowsky v. New York, 535 F.2d 194 (2d Cir. 1976); Smith v. Estelle, 531 F.2d 260 (5th Cir. 1976). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,623 Eckart R. Straub v. Vaisman and Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation
(2×)
Compare Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 434 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1660, 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971), and Holdsworth v. Strong (No. 75-1144, 10th Cir. Feb. 27, 1976), with Carroll v. First National Bank, 413 F.2d 353 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1003 , 90 S.Ct. 552 , 24 L.Ed.2d 494 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Seventeen Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars in Currency, and Ronald A. Nocenti, Claimant-Appellant
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Hoffa, 437 F.2d 11 (6th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1664 , 29 L.Ed.2d 154 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Manausa
Compare Clement A. Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, 5th Cir., 434 F.2d 100, 104 (1970), cert. denied 402 U.S. 988 , 91 S.Ct. 1660 , 29 L.Ed.2d 153 (1971), with Hill York Corp. v. American Internat’l Franchises, Inc., supra 448 F.2d at 690 ; John E.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sutton
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 6051.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1971.
Are, Black, Granted, Should.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.